Did a one-continuous-trip permit exempt a vehicle delivered to a service member in California?

Short answer No. California delivery made the delivering dealer liable for sales tax even when the buyer was in transit and immediately removed the vehicle.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 580.0280
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1966-03-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An organization receiving overseas-dealer and customer questions about California vehicle deliveries

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1966. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1966
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a March 21, 1966 California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter about vehicles delivered in California to service members or civilians for immediate removal under a one-continuous-trip permit. It predates the legislative proposal discussed in the letter and reflects then-current section 6007. Current military, vehicle-permit, delivery, sales-tax, and use-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Sales tax applied when a dealer delivered a vehicle to a service member in California, even if the buyer was only in transit and obtained a DMV one-continuous-trip permit to remove the vehicle immediately.

Section 6007 placed the tax on the California delivering dealer whether that dealer made the original sale or delivered for an out-of-state retailer not engaged in business in California. The letter distinguished possible service-member use-tax or vehicle-license relief from sales tax imposed on the retailer.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6007 (as cited)
  • California Assembly Bill No. 4 (pending proposal described in the 1966 source; not treated as enacted law)

Source

Original ruling text

580.0280

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
March 21, 1966

Attention:
Gentlemen:
This will acknowledge your letter of February 23, 1966, concerning inquiries you have received from overseas dealers and individuals regarding California sales tax on vehicles delivered to military and civilian personnel in this state. When a dealer sells a vehicle and delivers it to a serviceman in this state, the sales tax applies regardless of the fact that the serviceman is “in transit,” and secures a “One Continuous Trip Permit” from the Department of Motor Vehicles to move the vehicle to a point outside this state. The dealer making delivery in California is the part upon whom the tax is imposed whether he actually makes the sale to the serviceman or makes the delivery pursuant to a retail sale made by a dealer not engaged in business in this state, as provided by § 6007 of the Sales and Use Tax Law. We are not aware of the source of the information which has been furnished you by various foreign dealers, and others, that cars may be delivered to servicemen in California without application of sales tax. There is possible some confusion as between the sales tax and vehicle license fees, or possible as between the sales tax and the use tax from which servicemen are exempt under certain conditions. There is, however, pending before the State Legislature Assembly Bill No. 4 which would provide for a sales tax exemption on sales of automobiles sold to nonresident servicemen on active duty who will not use the cars in this state, except to remove them from the state. This bill, however, even if enacted into law would not apply retroactively to exempt sales made before the law proposed by the bill became operative. For your information, a copy of the complete bill is enclosed. Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
EHS:fb
Enclosure
cc:

San Francisco – District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1966. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace