Who was the retailer when a dealer subcontracted installation of evaporative coolers on nonpermanent mobilehomes?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Because the mobilehomes stood on steel piers rather than permanent foundations, they remained tangible personal property. Installing the cooler therefore was not a construction contract on real property.
The dealer contracted to furnish and install the cooler and subcontracted the physical work, so the dealer was the retailer and owed sales tax on the full retail receipts.
To avoid tax twice, the HVAC contractor should buy the cooler for resale from its vendor, and the dealer should give the contractor a resale certificate. Tax then applied only to the dealer's retail sale.
Citations and references
- State Board of Equalization Pamphlet No. 47, Mobilehomes and Factory-Built Housing (identified in the source)
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/580-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/580-0200.pdf
Original ruling text
580.0200
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450
May 31, 1991
Dear ---:
This is reply to your April 22, 1991 letter regarding the application of sales tax to sales of evaporative coolers installed in mobilehomes. You note that the mobilehomes are not on permanent foundations but are set on steel piers in a mobilehome park. You asked for confirmation of your interpretation of State Board of Equalization Pamphlet No. 47, Mobilehomes and Factory-Built Housing, that a dealer is the retailer of evaporative coolers the dealer sells where the dealer has a heating and air conditioning contractor furnish and install the evaporative coolers pursuant to a lump-sum contract. Since the mobilehome is not installed in a permanent foundation, it retains its status a tangible personal property. According, the contractor, in furnishing and installing the evaporative cooler, does not thereby perform a construction contract. As we understand the facts, the dealer contracts to furnish and install the cooler and subcontracts the job to the heating and air conditioning contractor. In such case, the dealer is the retailer of the evaporative cooler. The dealer is required to pay sales tax on the entire gross receipts of the retail sale. You note that, if the air conditioning contractor had paid sales tax reimbursement on its purchase, the dealer’s paying sales tax would result in sales tax being paid twice on the same transaction. We agree. The problem stems from the air conditioning contractor paying sales tax reimbursement to its vendor. The sale of the cooler by the air conditioning contractor’s vendor is a sale for resale, and the contractor should issue a resale certificate to its vendor. In turn, the dealer should issue a resale certificate to the air conditioning contractor such that sales tax property applies only to the retail sale by the dealer. We hope this answers your question; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours, Ronald L. Dick Senior Tax Counsel
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace