Could a California-delivered automobile be treated as a resale when the recipient leased vehicles?

Short answer Yes. Because the recipient was a permitted vehicle lessor rather than a consumer, a valid resale certificate relieved the delivering seller of tax.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 580.0080
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1955-09-14
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A seller asking about an automobile sold through a Seattle dealer and delivered in Oakland to a leasing company

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1955. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1955
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a September 14, 1955 California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter about a car sold through a Seattle dealer and delivered through an Oakland dealer to a California vehicle-leasing business. Its result depended on the recipient being a permitted lessor buying for resale and furnishing the required certificate. Current leasing, resale-certificate, courtesy-delivery, dealer, and sales-tax rules may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Section 6007 ordinarily treated California delivery to an out-of-state dealer's consumer as a taxable retail sale by the person making delivery.

Here, however, the recipient was in the automobile-leasing business, held a California seller's permit, and offered a resale certificate. Because the recipient was buying for resale through leasing rather than as a consumer, acceptance of a certificate in the required form relieved the seller of tax liability.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6007 (as cited and described)

Source

Original ruling text

580.0080

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
September 14, 1955

Your letter of June 21
Gentlemen:
Recently you sold an automobile to a Seattle dealer with delivery trips made to the Seattle dealer's customer through an Oakland dealer. The customer is engaged in the business of leasing automobiles and operates in California. It is true that you will normally charge sales tax where you make delivery in California to a customer of an out-of-state dealer. The basis for this is the second paragraph of Section 6007 of the Sales and Use Tax Law. For the purposes of the sales tax the term “retail sale” means a sale for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. The second paragraph of Section 6007 provides an exception to this rule. A transaction is a retail sale in this state if an owner or former owner of tangible personal property delivers it in this state to a consumer pursuant to a retail sale made by a person not engaged in business in this state. The person making the delivery is regarded as making a retail sale and is liable for tax measured by the amount paid by the consumer. This applies, however, only if the person taking delivery is a consumer. Under the California Sales and Use Tax Law a person engaged in the business of leasing may purchase property under a resale certificate. If such a person furnishes you with a resale certificate, you may report your sale as being for resale and therefore exempt. In the particular case involved, you state that the leasing company has a California seller's permit and that they are willing to furnish a resale certificate. Your acceptance of such a certificate in the form required in the ruling, copy enclosed, will relieve you of liability for the tax. Very truly yours,

Bill Holden
Associate Tax Counsel
RH:tj
cc:
Oakland - Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1955. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace