Should DMV collect use tax on a transfer-only title transaction for a vehicle not currently required to be registered?

Short answer No. Section 6292 did not authorize DMV collection when the transferred vehicle was not required to be registered under the Vehicle Code.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 580.0075
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-02-22
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
The Board's Occasional Sales Use Tax Unit asking whether DMV should collect on transfer-only transactions

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a February 22, 1989 California State Board of Equalization internal tax-counsel memorandum interpreting a 1981 Board-DMV agreement and then-current section 6292. The continuation page displays February 12, 1989, conflicting with the first-page date; this page uses the complete first-page memorandum date. The opinion addresses DMV collection authority for the two stated transfer-only situations, not every possible tax or registration consequence. Current law may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

DMV's transfer-only category covered two situations described in the memorandum: an off-highway vehicle such as a warehouse or farm forklift that was titled but not registered for road use, and a vehicle operated and registered outside California while retaining California title.

DMV correctly did not collect use tax under section 6292 in those transactions. That section applied when a retail sale involved a vehicle required to be registered under the Vehicle Code; these vehicles were not currently required to be registered in the situations described.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6292 (as cited)
  • 1981 Board of Equalization-Department of Motor Vehicles Interagency Agreement (described in the source)
  • DMV Registration Manual section 28.200 (quoted in the source)

Source

Original ruling text

580.0075

February 22, 1989
Mr. Vic Day
Occasional Sales Use Tax Unit

Ronald L. Dick:
Tax Counsel
Collection of Use Tax by

Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)

This is in reply to your January 27, l989 memorandum regarding a 1981 Interagency Agreement between the Board of Equalization and the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) wherein the agencies agreed that the DMV would not collect use tax on transfer only transactions. You sent a copy of DMV Registration Manual section 28.200 which describes the nontaxable transaction as: "An application for 'transfer only' of a vehicle or vessel not currently licensed at the time of purchase by the applicant and not subject to renewal of registration. If purchase was made on or before expiration of registration, use tax is due.” Given this information, you asked for our opinion as to whether tax should apply to the transactions. No, we believe that the DMV Registration Manual correctly states the application of tax to the specific situation. We understand that the
•transfer only* transaction arises in two factual situations. The more common of the two is where a vehicle such as a forklift is titled with DMV but not registered for operation, because the vehicle is operated only off the highway such as in a warehouse or on a farm. The other situation occurs when the owner of a vehicle takes the vehicle out of state for operation and registers the vehicle out of state but retains title in California. We believe that the DMV is correct in not collecting use tax in either situation. Generally, when a "vehicle required to be registered under the “Vehicle Code" is sold at retail by other than a person licensed or certified under the Vehicle code as a dealer, the purchaser must pay use tax to the DMV which acts on behalf of the Board in collecting the tax. (Rev. & Tax. Code
§ 6292.)

Mr. Vic Day

-2-

February

12, 1989

When a person sells a vehicle under either of the situations noted above, the sale is of a vehicle which is not “required to be registered”; therefore, Revenue and Taxation Code section 6292 is not applicable, and the DMV should not collect the use tax. RLD:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace