Could a taxpayer offset California vehicle use tax with properly due use tax from an earlier use in another state?

Short answer Yes. Section 6406 allowed the offset because the other state's valid use-tax liability arose before the California use.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 570.1625
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1972-04-24
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Audit Review and Refund

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1972. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1972
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This April 24, 1972 internal memorandum applies then-current section 6406 to a redacted vehicle transaction involving earlier taxable use in another state and later substantial California use within 90 days of purchase. The other state's identity is redacted. Current vehicle presumptions, use-tax liability, payment, and multistate credit law controls.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California allowed the taxpayer to offset its California vehicle use tax with the use tax properly due to another state.

The other state assessed use tax after an audit because the taxpayer had made a taxable use of the vehicle there before bringing it to California. The vehicle then entered California within 90 days of purchase and was substantially used here, creating California use-tax liability as well.

After review confirmed that the other state's tax was properly due and would be paid, the memorandum concluded that section 6406 applied and the taxpayer should receive the offset.

Common questions

Was merely receiving an out-of-state assessment enough?

No. The memorandum relied on the review's conclusion that the other-state tax was properly due and would be paid.

Which state's tax was credited?

The published memorandum redacts the state's name.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6406 — offset for properly due prior other-state tax applied

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Audit Review and Refund (GMD)

From:

Tax Counsel (GLR) - Headquarters

Subject:

S--- F--- T--- T--- Co.

570.1625

April 24, 1972

SY -- XX XXXXXX

In your memorandum of March 2, 1972 you ask whether the taxpayer under the circumstances set forth below is entitled to the offset provided in Section 6406. We understand that use tax was assessed by the State of --- as a result of an audit on the basis that a taxable use had been made of the vehicle by the taxpayer in --- prior to bringing it to California. Since the vehicle entered the state within ninety days from the date of purchase and was substantially used thereafter in California, it was concluded that the vehicle was also subject to California use tax. Upon review, it was concluded that the --- tax was properly due and will be paid. Under these circumstances, it is our opinion that Section 6406 is applicable and the offset provided therein should be granted to the taxpayer.

GLR:lb

cc:

Out-of-State
---

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1972. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace