Could a Nevada seller offset tax later imposed on past sales against California use tax collected on future sales?

Short answer No. The credit belonged to each purchaser for tax on the same property, so past Nevada tax could not offset California use tax on future customers' transactions.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 570.1617
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1969-08-25
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Redacted Nevada seller

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1969. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1969
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This August 25, 1969 advisory letter concerns a Nevada seller that had collected California use tax on past sales and later faced proposed Nevada sales tax on those same transactions. It applies then-current section 6406 and does not decide whether Nevada properly imposed its tax. Current multistate credit, retailer collection, refund, and transaction-allocation rules control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A Nevada business sold property in Nevada to California customers, collected California use tax, and remitted it to California. Nevada later proposed sales tax on those completed transactions. The seller wanted to offset that Nevada liability against California use tax collected on future sales.

California said no. Section 6406 gave the credit to the purchaser against California use tax on the particular property for which the purchaser paid another state's tax or reimbursement. The retailer merely collected and remitted the purchaser's California use tax.

For administrative convenience, a retailer could apply an other-state credit at the time of the same sale when the purchaser paid the other-state tax and received the benefit. That did not allow the seller to shift tax from old transactions to future purchases by different customers.

Common questions

Could the retailer carry the past credit forward?

No. The letter tied the credit to the purchaser and the same property, not to the retailer's aggregate tax account.

Could the retailer apply a credit at the time of sale?

Yes, for convenience, when the purchaser paid the Nevada tax reimbursement and received the credit against California use tax on that same property.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6406 — credit for qualifying sales or use tax paid to another state on the same property

Source

Original ruling text

570.1617

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

August 25, 1969

S--- M--- Co., Inc.
P. O. Box XXXX
XXX --- -----, Nevada XXXXX

Attention:

Mr. J. L. C---

SX -- XX XXXXXX

Gentlemen:

Your letter of July 29, 1969, has been referred to the legal staff of the board for attention. We understand that you have made sales in Nevada to California customers and have collected and paid California use tax. The State of Nevada proposes to impose Nevada sales tax on these past transactions, and you wish to offset that tax against future California use taxes pursuant to section 6406 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. Section 6406 allows a credit against the California use tax “…imposed on any person…to the extent that the person has paid a retail sales or use tax, or reimbursement therefore, imposed with respect to that property by any other state, …prior to the storage, use, or other consumption of that property in this state.” Under the section, the credit is to be taken by the purchaser against California use tax imposed with respect to the use of the particular property as to which he has paid tax, or reimbursement therefore, imposed by another state. The California use tax is imposed on the purchaser. The seller merely collects and remits it.

S--- M--- Co., Inc.
SX -- XX XXXXXX

-2-

August 25, 1969
570.1617

Accordingly, it would not be permissible for you, as the seller, to take a credit for Nevada sales tax on past transactions against California use tax on future transactions with other purchasers. For convenience, we do permit a seller to offset the Nevada sales tax against the California use tax at the time of sale. Under those circumstances, however, the conditions of section 6406 are met in that the purchaser pays Nevada tax reimbursement and gets the benefit of the credit against California use tax with respect to the particular property that is sold. Very truly yours,

T. P. Putnam
Tax Counsel
TPP:cc

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1969. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace