Were aircraft parts sent to California only for repair subject to California tax before shipment to Oregon?

Short answer Not under the described use-tax exclusion if the out-of-state sale was followed only by California repair and the parts then stayed outside California for the historical six-month period.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 570.1038
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1995-06-09
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Out-of-state aircraft-parts seller

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This June 9, 1995 opinion assumes the aircraft-parts sale occurred outside California, the parts entered by common carrier only for repair, and they were then shipped to the Oregon purchaser. It applies a historical six-month return test under section 6009.1. Current sale location, repair scope, shipment records, purchaser use, return timing, and current statutory or regulatory rules control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The aircraft-parts sale appeared to occur outside California, so use tax rather than sales tax was the relevant California tax. The parts came to California by common carrier for repair and were then shipped to the Oregon purchaser.

Section 6009.1 could exclude that repair-related California storage or use if the repaired parts stayed outside California for the historical six-month test period and were used solely outside the state. If they returned to California during that period, the exclusion did not apply.

Common questions

Did the seller owe California sales tax on the stated facts?

The letter said the sale appeared to occur outside California, so it analyzed use tax instead.

Was California repair alone disqualifying?

No, if the section 6009.1 conditions were satisfied.

What if the parts returned to California?

The exclusion did not apply under the historical rule described.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6009.1 — out-of-state-use exclusion applied
  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6007 and 6051 — retail sale and sales-tax framework discussed
  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6201 and 6401 — use-tax framework discussed
  • Cal. Code Regs. tit. 18, § 1620 — interstate sale and use-tax rules referenced

Source

Original ruling text

570.1038

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward

LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
Telephone: (916) 322-2976
FAX: (916) 323-3387

DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento

June 9, 1995

────────
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Ms. J--- K. W--T--- --- ---, Inc.
Administrative Center
P. O. Box XXXXX
--- ---, MO XXXXX
Re:

T--- --- ---, Inc.
SZ -- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Ms. W---n:
This is in response to your letter dated March 6, 1995 regarding the application of tax to your sales of aircraft parts. You state: "We sold aircraft parts to an Oregon vendor who requested that they be shipped to California via common carrier for repair. After repair they were shipped to Oregon via common carrier. "We billed California sales tax and the vendor is refusing to pay since the end use was not in California. We are requesting a letter from the State of California verifying that sales tax does not apply to this transaction." DISCUSSION Retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax, measured by gross receipts, unless specifically exempt by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) A retail sale is a sale for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6007.) When sales tax does not apply, such as when sales take place outside of California, the use tax, measured by the sales price of the property sold, applies to the use of property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in California. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6201, 6401, Reg. 1620.)

Ms. J--- K. W---

-2-

June 9, 1995
570.1038

It appears from the information you have provided that the sale of the aircraft parts took place outside of California; if so, the use tax, rather than the sales tax, applies. The purchaser will owe use tax if the parts were purchased for use in California unless the use is exempt or excluded from tax by statute. The relevant exclusion is set forth in Revenue and Taxation Code section 6009.1, which provides as follows: "Storage' anduse' do not include the keeping, retaining, or exercising any right or power over tangible personal property for the purpose of subsequently transporting it outside the state for use thereafter solely outside the state, or for the purpose of being processed, fabricated, or manufactured into, attached to or incorporated into, other tangible personal property to be transported outside the state and thereafter used solely outside the state." Since the aircraft parts were brought to California for repair and were then sent to the purchaser in Oregon, the repair in California will come within the section 6009.1 storage and use exclusion if, after the repaired parts are shipped to Oregon, they do not return to California during the six-month test period but are instead used solely outside this state. (See Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 570.1040 (2/3/66).) If the parts return to California, the exclusion does not apply. If you have further questions, please feel free to write again. Sincerely,

Kelly W. Ching
Staff Counsel
KWC:cl

cc:

Out-of-State District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace