Did a California laser manufacturer make taxable use of resale inventory by loaning units to out-of-state customers awaiting ordered models?

Short answer No. Delivery by common carrier to an out-of-state customer for use there was treated like an out-of-state lease or bailment, not California use.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 570.0200
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1965-02-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
San Jose Auditing

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1965. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1965
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This February 2, 1965 internal memorandum concerns gas lasers removed from stock, shipped by common carrier to out-of-state customers, used there temporarily, returned to California, checked and calibrated, and put back into inventory for sale as new. Current loan, bailment, resale-inventory, refurbishment, and use-tax rules control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A California laser manufacturer sometimes loaned an in-stock unit to an out-of-state customer waiting one to six months for a different ordered model. The loaner went outside California by common carrier, was used there, and always returned to the California plant for checking, calibration, and return to inventory.

California found no taxable use. It treated the arrangement like an ex-tax lease beginning with delivery outside the state: property acquired for resale and delivered to an out-of-state bailee for use there did not create California use tax on that out-of-state use.

Common questions

Did the loan help the manufacturer win the sale?

Often, but that fact did not change the result stated in the memorandum.

Did returning the loaner to California make the earlier out-of-state loan taxable?

No. The source treated the delivery and use outside California as nontaxable.

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum
570.0200

To:

San Jose – Auditing (SE:JPO)

From:

Tax Counsel (PRD)

Date:

February 2, 1965

This is in reply to your memo of December 7 in which you inquire about the taxability of the loan of gas lasers to out-of-state customers. The taxpayer is a manufacturer of lasers. As we understand the situation, the taxpayer is behind in his production schedule so that the taxpayer sometimes takes instruments out of stock and loans them to customers who have lasers on order. In most cases these lasers on order are different models from the loaner. Quite often the availability of the loaner instrument (laser) is influential in receiving the order. The model the customer orders is shipped to the customer anywhere from one to six months after receiving the original order. The out-of-state customer then returns the loaner to the California plant. The returned instrument is then checked, calibrated, and returned to stock to be sold as a new instrument; however, it may be loaned again. The lasers are shipped out of state by common carrier but are, in all cases, returned to California. In our opinion, these loans do not constitute a taxable use. The situation is somewhat analogous to the leasing of equipment to an out-of-state lessee. We have held in such cases that where the lessor has properly acquired the property under a resale certificate and subsequently leased the property to an out-of-state lessee, with the term of the lease commencing upon delivery at a point outside the state, he will not be liable for use tax for that out-of-state use. The same rule should apply where equipment is delivered to a bailee at an out-of-state point for use outside this state.

PRD:spg

[lb]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1965. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace