Could a wholesale grocer buy invoice forms for resale because it gave customers a copy with delivered goods?

Short answer No. The grocer primarily consumed the forms in its accounting and goods-flow system, so it could not buy them for resale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 570.0176
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1971-11-22
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Redacted wholesale grocery company

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1971. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1971
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This November 22, 1971 opinion addresses printed invoice forms used by a wholesale grocery company in its accounting system and supplied to customers with deliveries. It applies the then-current retail-sale and resale-purpose distinction to physical forms. Current invoicing practices, bundled documents, resale, and sales-and-use-tax law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California concluded that a wholesale grocery company was the consumer, not the retailer, of invoice forms it used to list products and check the flow of goods.

Giving a customer a copy when the goods were delivered did not make the form a purchase for resale in the regular course of business. Its primary use was part of the grocer's accounting system, so the company could not issue a resale certificate for the forms.

The opinion also tested the grocer's contrary theory. If the invoice copy really were resold, its transfer to the customer would itself be a taxable retail sale because the customer would not resell it. The taxable measure could then require the form's cost plus an assumed markup.

Common questions

Did mandatory delivery of a customer copy establish resale?

No. The opinion focused on the forms' accounting and goods-control use.

Would treating the form as resold avoid tax entirely?

No. Under that theory, the customer transfer would be a taxable sale of the form.

Citations and references

  • Retail-sale and resale-purpose definitions — applied in the opinion without section numbers

Source

Original ruling text

570.0176

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
November 22, 1971
Dear ______,
In your inquiry of November 21, 1971, you ask our opinion as to whether a wholesale grocery company, such as yourself, may purchase certain invoices for resale. We understand you not only use these invoices to list the products you sell to your customers but also supply your customers a copy upon the delivery of the property. You contend that since you must supply the invoices to your customers you are selling rather than consuming them. We disagree. The sales tax applies to retail sales of tangible personal property. A retail sale is defined as a sale for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. It is our opinion that you are using the invoices as a part of your accounting system and primarily for a check on the flow of goods. Accordingly, the invoices are purchased for some purpose other than resale in the regular course of business, and you may not purchase them for resale. For a moment, however, let us assume that your theory of resale is correct and therefore you can issue a resale certificate to your invoice supplier. Accordingly, under your theory, when you “sell” (issue) the invoice to your customer that transfer will be subject to sales tax. Your customers could not purchase it for resale since they are not going to resell the invoice. The next question would be what is the measure of tax. Since a personal normally makes a profit on his sales there is a possibility that we would have to compute a markup on the transfer of the invoice. In this case, the cost of the invoice plus the assumed markup would be regarded as the taxable measure. Summarily, we regard you as the consumer of the invoice and not the retailer. Very truly yours,

Glenn L. Rigby
Tax Counsel
CLR:lb

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1971. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace