Were Oregon-printed billing inserts taxable when a California billing vendor put them into out-of-state customer invoices?

Short answer Yes. Preparing the bills in California was use or consumption here, so the Oregon printer correctly collected use tax on the inserts.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 570.0022
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-01-30
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Redacted purchaser of Oregon-printed billing inserts

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This January 30, 1992 letter concerns Oregon-printed inserts delivered to a California billing vendor for placement into invoices later mailed to Oregon and Washington. It distinguishes direct out-of-state mailing without California possession. Current printing, mailing, agency, possession, sales-tax, and use-tax rules control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Use tax applied to billing inserts printed in Oregon and delivered to a California billing vendor. Putting them into customer invoices was California use or consumption even though the completed bills were mailed to Oregon and Washington.

The letter also said a California billing vendor's printing charges would be subject to sales tax when the sale occurred here. It described a different result only where the printer mailed the inserts directly out of state and neither the purchaser nor its agent took possession in California.

Common questions

Did out-of-state mailing alone make the inserts exempt?

No.

What California act mattered?

The California vendor prepared the bills by placing the inserts into them.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6201 — use-tax imposition applied
  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6203 — retailer collection duty cited
  • Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 570.1110 — direct interstate-forwarding example distinguished

Source

Original ruling text

570.0022

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 327-3400
January 30, 1992
Dear __,
I am writing in response to your November 11, 1991 request for legal advice regarding the applicability of California Sales and Use Tax to certain transactions of
_. According to your letter, a printer in Oregon is collecting California use tax on its sales to of billing inserts. The inserts are shipped to in California which operates as a billing vendor. The inserts are placed into customer invoices which are subsequently mailed into Oregon and Washington. You feel that this tax was incorrectly charged. Unless specifically excluded or exempted from taxation by statute, all gross receipts from retail sales or purchases for use within this state of tangible personal property are subject to either sales or use tax. The use tax is imposed upon the storage, use or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6201.) The legal obligation to pay use tax is on the purchaser rather than the retailer. However, the retailer is required to collect and remit the use tax provided that the retailer is engages in business in this state. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6203.) Since the billing inserts are being consumed or used by in California, the Oregon printer is correct in adding use tax to its printing charges. The only situation where we have found tax inapplicable to this type of transaction is where a catalog preaddressed outside of California to a customer outside of California was delivered to the purchaser’s agent in California solely for the purpose of forwarding to the out-of-state destination. Under these circumstances there is a continuous interstate journey with no use made in this state. (Annotation 570.1110, 11/28/66. The annotations provide guidance to previous staff decisions.) Under the facts you have given, a use is made in California because the billings are prepared here. You also asked whether tax will be applicable to printing charges made by the California billing vendor if bills are mailed to customers out-of-state. In this case, the sale will take place in California and sales tax will be owed. The only circumstance under which the sale would be tax exempt would be if the printer mailed the inserts directly out-of-state and ___ or its agent never took possession of the inserts. Please feel free to contact us again if you have further questions. Sincerely, Stella Levy Tax Counsel

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace