Could a federal construction contractor buy all non-realty property for resale to the United States?

Short answer Only when the same conditions as the approved office supplies applied: title passed before functional use, and the property was totally consumed and used exclusively on the contract.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 565.1460
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1984-12-17
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
United States construction contractor (name redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1984. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1984
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This brief December 17, 1984 letter extends a conclusion from an earlier January 6 letter whose complete facts and contract are not included. The extension applies only if the other property shares the assumed facts for office supplies: federal title before functional use, total consumption, and exclusive use in the identified construction contract. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Item incorporation, title clause, timing, functional use, consumption, mixed use, and current law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A federal construction contractor asked whether every item of tangible personal property not incorporated into real property could be bought ex tax for resale to the United States.

An earlier letter had approved resale treatment for office supplies because the contract passed title to the government before the contractor functionally used them. The analysis also assumed those supplies were totally consumed and used exclusively in performing the federal contract.

This letter extended the same result to other non-realty tangible personal property only if all of those same factors were present. The contractor's sale to the United States would then be exempt under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6381.

Common questions

Was non-incorporation into realty enough by itself?

No.

When did title have to pass?

Before the contractor's functional use of the property.

Could the property be used on other work?

Not under the assumptions stated; it had to be exclusively used and totally consumed on the identified contract.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, reg. 1521(b)(1) — federal construction-contractor treatment
  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code section 6381 — exempt sale to the United States
  • January 6, 1984 prior opinion — incorporated factual and contract basis not reproduced in this source

Source

Original ruling text

565.1460

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-8485
December 17, 1984
Dear REDACTED TEXT,
This is in response to your letter of November 19, 1984 which raised the following question: “Can all tangible personal property acquired for the REDACTED TEXT contract, that is not incorporated on or into real property, be acquired ex-tax for resale to the U.S. Government?” In our January 6, 1984 letter to you, it was concluded that the referenced REDACTED TEXT contract was a construction contract for the U.S. Government. As such, Regulation 1521(b)(1) has application. It was also concluded in our analysis, under the heading “Item(d)” that, pursuant to the contract title to various office supplies passed to the U.S. Government prior to functional use of such items, and; therefore, the sales of the items to the contractor were exempt sales for resale and the subsequent sale by the contractor to the U.S. Government are exempt sales pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6381. Our conclusion regarding the office supplies was grounded on our assumption that all supplies in question would be totally consumed and exclusively utilized in performing the REDACTED TEXT contract. Assuming that the same factors relied on in reaching our conclusion with respect to the office supplies are in evidence with respect to the other tangible personal property, alluded to in your question, the same conclusion is in order. Very truly yours, E. Leslie Sorensen, Jr. Tax Counsel ELS:rar

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1984. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace