Was a floating floodgate fabricated for a federal naval drydock machinery and equipment or taxable property used to improve realty?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1969. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A fabricator delivered a floodgate, without installing it, to the prime contractor building a permanent three-sided naval drydock for the United States. The gate could float away when not in use and was connected to the drydock by a chain.
When positioned, water entered the gate's compartments so it sank and sealed the drydock's open end. The memorandum treated it as the essential fourth side: without the gate, the drydock could not create the safe, dry work area needed for ship repairs.
The gate was therefore property sold to the prime contractor for use in improving realty, not machinery and equipment resold exempt to the United States. Tax applied to the fabricator's sales price.
Common questions
Did the ability to float the gate away make it machinery and equipment?
No.
Why was it part of the improvement?
It was essential to sealing and using the drydock.
What was the taxable measure identified?
The sales price charged to the prime contractor.
Citations and references
- Historical Sales and Use Tax Ruling 12, requirement (3) — machinery-and-equipment function test applied by the memorandum
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/565-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/565-0260.pdf
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
565.0260
Memorandum
To:
Oakland – Auditing
From:
Tax Counsel
Subject:
REDACTED TEXT
Date:
Jan. 29, 1969
In your memo of December 31, 1968, you ask for advice as to the correct application of the tax to a sale of a drydock floodgate, fabricated and delivered, without installation, to a contractor who will install it under a contract with the U.S. for the construction of a naval drydock. You state that the drydock itself is a permanent installation affixed to realty and constructed with three sides. The floodgate when floated into position at the open end of the drydock, constitutes the fourth side of the structure and seals off the open end. The gate is attached to the drydock by chain and when not in use may be "floated" away. We concur in your belief that under Sales and Use Tax Ruling 12, tax applies to the sale and delivery of the floodgate by the fabricator to the prime contractor. Since the three sides of the drydock can be considered as realty, the question raised is whether the floodgate constitutes "machinery and equipment" so that the sale to the contractor is an exempt sale for resale to the U.S. Government, under the provisions of Ruling 12. The requirement most pertinent in determining whether the floodgate when installed is machinery and equipment is requirement (3) of the ruling, i.e., that in order to constitute machinery and equipment, the property must be "installed for the purpose of performing a manufacturing operation or some other function not essential to the structure itself." As I understand it, the gate initially is secured by a chain, one end of which is fastened in some manner to the drydock and the other to a winch on the gate itself, which operates to place the gate in the proper position to seal the open end of the drydock through a process of permitting water to enter compartments within the gate, thereby causing it to sink, making the drydock enclosure water tight. The gate remains in this position during the time the drydock is in use. Under the circumstances and in view of the intended purpose of the drydock, the existence of the floodgate is essential to the drydock. Without the gate, the purpose of the drydock to provide a safe, dry working area necessary for performance of work on ships, is defeated. The floodgate constitutes the fourth side without which the drydock would be useless for the intended purpose. Accordingly, it is concluded that the floodgate is tangible personal property sold by the fabricator to the prime contractor for use in the performance of a contract with the U.S. for the improvement of real property. The tax applies to the sales price of the floodgate to the prime contractor. JM: smk [lb]
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1969. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace