Was cement sold for federal machinery foundations taxable when the contractor immediately rebilled it and passed title to the United States?

Short answer Yes. California treated the cement as consumed in improving real property, so immediate federal title and rebilling did not exempt the sale to the contractor.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 565.0200
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1952-05-09
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Cement seller (name redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1952. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1952
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 9, 1952 letter applies historical Ruling 12 and section 6384 to cement used for machinery foundations under a United States contract. The parties and account number are redacted, and the source does not reproduce the contract or describe the machinery. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Foundation design, real-property status, contractor role, agency terms, title passage, billing, and current construction-contract law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A seller provided cement to a contractor for machinery foundations. The contractor rebilled the cement to the United States, and title passed to the government immediately.

The letter treated the machinery foundation as part of the real property. Because the contractor used the cement to improve realty under a United States contract, the sale of the cement to the contractor was taxable.

Section 6384 controlled despite immediate government title. The letter explained that the rule applied whether the contractor bought as a federal agent or for its own account before reselling the property to the United States.

Common questions

Was the machinery foundation real property?

Yes. The letter said the foundation was part of the realty.

Did immediate title passage to the United States avoid tax?

No.

Did it matter that the larger contract principally involved personal property?

No. The letter said that fact was immaterial to the cement used for the real-property improvement.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code section 6384 — federal-contractor sale rule quoted and applied
  • Historical Sales and Use Tax Ruling 12 — materials used in United States real-property construction

Source

Original ruling text

565.0200

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
May 9, 1952
Attention: REDACTED TEXT

Account No. REDACTED TEXT

Gentlemen:
This is in reply to your letter of April 10 concerning the application of sales tax to the sale of cement by you to REDACTED TEXT for use by REDACTED TEXT in constructing machinery foundations. REDACTED TEXT rebilled the cement to the United States with title passing immediately to the United States. As indicated in Sales and Use Tax Ruling 12, copy enclosed, sales tax applies with respect to sales of materials to contractors for use in the performance of contracts with the United States for the construction of improvements to real property. The fact that the contract may provide principally for the manufacture or acquisition of tangible personal property is immaterial. The cement sold by you was used by REDACTED TEXT to construct a foundation for machinery. The foundation is part of the realty. Accordingly, REDACTED TEXT used the cement in the performance of a contract with the United States for the improvement of realty and the sale of the cement to REDACTED TEXT is subject to sales tax. Ruling 12 was adopted in accordance with Section 6384 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code which specifically provides that notwithstanding any other provision of law the tax imposed under this part shall apply to the gross receipts from the sale of any tangible personal property to contractors purchasing such property either as the agents of the United States or for their own account and subsequent resale to the United States for use in the performance of contracts with the United States for the construction of improvements on or to real property. Very truly yours, W. W. Mangels Assistant Counsel NBH : ja

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1952. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace