How did California tax engineering, site work, and a registered modular building under one federal military-base contract?

Short answer Engineering fees were not taxable, site-improvement materials were taxable to the contractor, and the sale or lease of a qualifying registered modular unit to the United States was exempt.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 565.0183
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1990-12-07
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Prospective federal supply contractor (name redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This December 7, 1990 letter addresses a proposed military-base contract with separate engineering, site-improvement, and modular-building portions. Its modular-unit conclusion is limited to prefabricated units registered with the Department of Motor Vehicles or Department of Housing and Community Development; the letter expressly declined to classify every building made under housing regulations as tangible personal property. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Registration, attachment, contract structure, federal purchaser status, subcontractor work, and current regulations can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California separated the proposed federal contract into three components rather than giving the whole project one tax treatment.

Architectural and engineering fees were not subject to sales or use tax. For excavation, utilities, foundations, and other site improvements, Regulation 1521 treated the contractor and subcontractors as consumers of the incorporated fixtures and materials, so California sales or use tax applied to their purchases.

A modular prefabricated unit registered with the Department of Motor Vehicles or Department of Housing and Community Development was tangible personal property even when connected to plumbing and utilities. Its sale or lease to the federal government was exempt, and materials installed into that unit by Texas or California subcontractors likewise became part of the exempt government property. A California subcontractor with a seller's permit could buy those materials for resale.

Common questions

Were the design and engineering charges taxable?

No.

Who owed tax on the site-improvement materials?

The contractor or subcontractors consuming fixtures and materials in the excavation, utility, foundation, and other real-property work.

Did every modular building qualify as tangible personal property?

No. The letter relied on registration with the specified California department and expressly declined to classify every modular building built under housing regulations.

What happened when materials were bought in Texas for California site work?

California use tax applied when the materials entered California, with a section 6406 credit for qualifying sales or use tax paid to Texas.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, reg. 1521 — construction-contractor and registered-prefabricated-unit rules applied
  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, reg. 1614 — federal-government sale or lease treatment cited by the official annotation
  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code section 6406 — credit for qualifying tax paid to another state

Source

Original ruling text

565.0183

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-3723
December 7, 1990
Dear REDACTED TEXT,
This is in response to your facsimile transmission of December 6, 1990. We understand that REDACTED TEXT is in the process of bidding a supply contract with the Federal government at REDACTED TEXT A.F.B. Prior to bidding the project, REDACTED TEXT needs to make sure that it is properly addressing the California sales and use tax laws. The contract will be a supply contract that has three basic portions. The first portion includes providing some basic services to the government. These services are architectural and engineering services. The second portion of the contract includes construction work to be completed on the base. This work includes site excavation, utilities, and foundation work. The third portion of the contract involves the leasing of a modular, prefabricated building that comes under the regulation of the Department of Housing. We can confirm our advice to you by telephone of December 6, 1990, as follows: (1) Neither California sales tax nor use tax applies on the engineering fees without regard as to whether the engineering work is done by companies outside of California or done by companies in California. (2) With respect to site improvement work, application of tax is determined by our Regulation 1521, “Construction Contractors”. Under that regulation, contractors are consumers for California sales and use tax purposes of all fixtures and materials incorporated into site improvements. This means that sales tax applies to sales of materials made by California vendors to you as the contractor or to subcontractors. California use tax applies to materials purchased outside this state and incorporated into site improvements in this state. (3) If materials are purchased in Texas, California use tax must be paid when the materials are brought into California. Credit could be taken against the California use tax for any sales or use tax paid in Texas, under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6406. (4) Under our Regulation 1521, paragraph (c)(3), “prefabricated units such as commercial coaches, house trailers, etc., registered with the Department of Motor Vehicles or the Department of House and Community Development, are tangible personal property even though they may be connected to plumbing and utilities.” We cannot say that all modular prefabricated buildings built to the California Housing Regulations are classified as tangible personal property. Our regulation provides that the fabricated unites “registered” with the Department are tangible personal property. The manner of attachment to land is irrelevant.

(5)
As stated, fabricated units registered with the Department of Housing and Community Development are tangible personal property. Neither sales tax nor use tax applies to the sale or lease of such property to the federal government. (6) It makes no difference if the company or companies that are manufacturing, selling or leasing the modular buildings are located outside the state of California. (7) If a Texas subcontractor performs work on the modular building, such as providing and installing the lights in the building, tax does not apply to the subcontractor’s charges or to the materials that become a part of the tangible personal property sold or leased to the federal government. (8) If a California subcontractor performs work on the modular building, such as providing and installing lights, the materials provided by the subcontractor are also exempt from sales or use tax if the building is sold or leased to the federal government. if the subcontractor has a California seller’s permit, he may purchase the materials without paying California tax by issuing a resale certificate to the vendor. Very truly yours, Gary J. Jugum Assistant Chief Counsel GJJ:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1990. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace