Were bank and savings-and-loan sales of U.S. Mint gold and silver Olympic coins under consignment subject to California sales or use tax?

Short answer No. California treated the retail transactions as sales by the United States because the Mint kept title, set the price, received the proceeds, and required return of unsold coins. Any tax collected still had to be returned, refunded, or paid to the Board.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 560.0090
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1984-06-06
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A redacted inquirer about banks distributing U.S. Mint Olympic coins

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1984. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1984
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a June 6, 1984 California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It addresses specific U.S. Mint consignment agreements for legal-tender Olympic coins, including fixed prices, retained federal title, cost-only discounts, special accounts, and return of unsold coins. Different distributor agreements may produce a different result. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Banks and savings-and-loan institutions sold legal-tender Olympic coins under consignment agreements with the U.S. Mint. The Mint retained title until retail sale, set fixed prices, prohibited added tax, received sale proceeds through special accounts, and required timely return of unsold coins.

Although California viewed the institutions as consignees with power to pass title rather than federal agents, it concluded that the specific transactions were sales by the United States. That exemption took precedence over the ordinary consignee-retailer rule.

No sales tax applied, purchasers owed no use tax, and institutions had no use-tax collection duty. Any amount already collected as tax had to be returned to customers; if already remitted, the institution could claim a refund conditioned on returning it. Unreturned tax amounts had to be paid to the Board.

What this means for you

Financial institutions, government-program distributors, and tax advisers

Review who holds title, controls price, receives proceeds, bears inventory obligations, and authorizes tax collection. If tax was collected on an exempt government sale, trace and correct every amount.

Common questions

Q: Were the institutions federal agents?

A: No, according to the letter.

Q: Why were the sales still exempt?

A: The transaction's retained-title and control features made them sales by the United States.

Q: Could an institution keep tax it collected?

A: No.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6352 and 6402
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1569
  • United States v. New Mexico, citation printed in the source as 445 U.S. 720

Source

Original ruling text

560.0090

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
916/445-6557

June 6, 1984

Mr. H--- B----- --- ----- --- -----, --- XXXXX
Dear Mr. B---:
This is in reply to your letter of June 4, 1984, regarding certain distributions of gold and silver Olympic coins by financial institutions. For the reasons expressed below, and with one exception, we have concluded that the financial institutions will incur no California sales or use tax liability with respect to the described transactions. We understand that the Olympic coins are legal tender in the United States. The silver coins have a face value of one dollar and the gold coins have a face value of ten dollars. The coins are sold through depository financial institutions (banks or savings and loans) under “Consignment Agreements” with the United States Mint. The Consignment Agreements provide that the participating financial institution is an “agent” of the U.S. Mint for purposes of making retail sales of the coins. The institution orders a number of coins or sets of coins, and agrees to hold them “in trust” as property of the United States. Title to the coins “remains in the U.S. Mint” until they are sold at retail. The retail selling price is set by the United States at $32.00 for each silver coin and $352.00 for each gold coin. The financial institution has no authority to charge a higher or lower amount. Nor is there any authority to add sales tax reimbursement or use tax to the selling price, although some institutions have apparently done so on their own initiative. The institution is not required to pay for any coin prior to the retail sale. Rather, each day the institution is to deposit the proceeds from that day’s sales, less a discount, into a special Olympic Coin Deposit Account. The discount, $3.50 per silver coin and $22.75 per gold coin, is intended solely to cover the costs of sale and provides no profit to the institution. Every 30 days, all funds in the special account are to be mailed to the Federal Reserve Bank in San Francisco. The consignment agreements expire on January 31, 1985. All unsold coins must be returned at the institution’s expense within five days of that date. The institution bears full risk of loss, and must pay for all coins which are unsold but not returned to the United States.

Mr. H--- B---

-2-

June 6, 1984
560.0090

In our opinion, despite the use of the word “agent” in the Consignment Agreement, the financial institutions are not agents of the United States Government. (See United States v. New Mexico et al., 445 U.S. 720.) Rather, they are consignees who have the power to pass title to the coins. As a general rule, consignees with the power to pass title are sellers and retailers subject to tax. (Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1569.) However, sales by the United States are not subject to sales tax. (See Rev. & Tax. Code, §6352.) Under the facts of this case, we have concluded that the exemption for sales by the United States takes precedence over the general rule for consignees. In reaching this conclusion, we rely on the following factors, among others. Title to the coins remains in the United States, and the institutions hold the coins in trust for the United States. The United States sets the retail selling price and the institutions have no authority to raise or lower the price. The United States have not authorized the institutions to collect tax or tax reimbursement from the customers. The institutions make no profit on the transactions, retaining only a discount to cover the costs of sale. All unsold coins must be returned to the United States by a specified date, and the institutions must bear the risk of loss. Accordingly, we conclude that sales tax does not apply to the sales of the coins. For the same reasons, we also conclude that the purchasers are not liable for use tax (Rev. & Tax. Code
§6402), so the institutions have no duty to collect use tax.
Where amounts represented as tax or tax reimbursement are or have been collected from customers, the collecting institution should take the following steps. If the tax has not as yet been paid over to the Board, the institution should return it directly to the customer. If the tax has already been paid to the Board, the institution should file a claim for refund. Refund to the institution will be conditional upon the institution’s return of the money to the customer. Any amounts collected from the customers as tax or tax reimbursement, which are not returned to the customers, must be paid to the Board. With this exception, the institutions participating in the Consignment Agreements are not liable for sales or use tax with respect to the Olympic coins. Very truly yours,

James E. Mahler
Tax Counsel
JEM:ba

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1984. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace