Could a customer-signed statement executed before delivery explicitly pass title to aggregate before the seller transported it?

Short answer Yes, if it clearly identified the seller's plant as the place title passed. The proposed phrase 'point of origin' needed that clarification.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 557.0599
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1984-09-28
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Vice president of an aggregate rock-base seller

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1984. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1984
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This September 28, 1984 letter addressed an aggregate rock-base seller making F.O.B. plant sales and sometimes delivering with its own trucks or arranging a third-party common carrier. Before delivery, customers signed a form saying title passed at the 'point of origin.' California accepted the concept but required a clearer location such as the seller's plant. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Execution timing, exact title language, separate statement, direct delivery, carrier identity, delivered-price terms, and current law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An aggregate seller sometimes delivered rock base in its own trucks and sometimes arranged a common carrier. Before delivery, it required customers to sign a form saying title passed at the "point of origin."

California said a pre-delivery written agreement could establish earlier title passage, including for the seller's own-truck deliveries. But "point of origin" should be replaced with a clear location, such as the seller's plant.

When the parties effectively transferred title before shipment, separately stated direct transportation charges were not taxable under the described facts.

Common questions

Was a signed pre-delivery title clause potentially sufficient?

Yes.

What wording problem did California identify?

"Point of origin" did not clearly identify where title passed.

Did the opinion require a specific alternative?

It gave the seller's plant as the example.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, reg. 1628(a) and (b)(3)(B) — third-party transportation and explicit pre-delivery title agreements as quoted in the letter

Source

Original ruling text

557.0599

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
916/ 445-6493

September 28, 1984

Mr. S--- H--Vice President
W--- C--- R--- P--XXXXX --- --- Road
---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. H---:
This is in reply to your letter of August 7, 1984. Your inquiry concerns the correct application of tax to transportation charges. We understand that your company, W--- C--- R--- P--- (“W---”) is a Division of H--E---, Inc. W--- is in the business of selling aggregate rock base to the public F.O.B. their plant site. In some cases, W--- delivers the purchased materials to the customer using their own trucks or, alternately, transportation is arranged through a third party common carrier. You indicate that prior to delivery W--- requires the customer to sign a form which states the following: “I/we the customer are aware that title to the material purchased passes at the point of origin.” You ask whether tax applies to the freight charges if the customer signs this form prior to the time of delivery. Regulation 1628(a) provides that in the case of a sale, tax does not apply to separately stated charges for transportation of property from the retailer’s place of business or other point from which delivery is made directly to the purchaser, provided the transportation is by other than facilities of the retailer, i.e., by independent contract or common carrier. The place where the sale occurs, i.e., title passes to the customer, is immaterial, except when the property is sold for a delivered price or the transportation is by facilities of the retailer. Regulation 1628(b)(3)(B) provides that when transportation is by facilities of the retailer or the property is sold for a delivered price, the sale occurs at the time and place at which the retailer completes his performance with reference to the physical delivery of the property, unless the parties “explicitly agreed that title is to pass at a prior time.” It is our position that when the retailer uses its own facilities to deliver the property, title passes when the property is delivered to the

W--- C--- R--- P---

-2-

September 28, 1984
557.0599

purchaser at the destination point, unless there exists an explicit written agreement executed prior to the delivery that title is to pass at some other time. Subject to the modification described below, it is our opinion that the statement signed by W---’ customers is sufficient to show the existence of an explicit agreement between W--- and its customers which provides for the sale and transfer of title of the purchased goods to the buyer prior to delivery. Instead of using the term “point of origin,” however, the statement signed by the customer should be modified to clearly indicate the place where title passes to the customer, e.g., at the seller’s plant. Therefore, where W--- and their customers effectively transfer title to the purchased goods prior to shipment by executing the above-described statement, separately stated charges for transportation will not be subject to tax, provided such charges are for transportation from W---’s plant site directly to the purchaser. If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please write this office. Very truly yours,

Charles J. Graziano
Tax Counsel

CJG:ao

bc:

--- – District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1984. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace