When did title to personalized checks pass if a bank agreed to send them to customers but had no explicit title clause or destination-delivery duty?

Short answer At shipment. The bank completed its physical-delivery performance when it sent the checks, so Commercial Code section 2401(2)(a) passed title then and there.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 557.0508
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1970-12-22
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board auditor reviewing a bank's personalized-check sales

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1970. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1970
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This December 22, 1970 internal memorandum supplemented a December 17 memorandum concerning delivery charges included in a bank's sales prices for personalized checks. California understood that the bank had no explicit title agreement with customers and was required to send the checks but not deliver them at destination. The attached order list was for another bank and apparently excluded delivery, so it was not used to alter the title analysis. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Exact customer agreements, shipment and destination duties, title clauses, sales documents, and current law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A bank sold personalized checks to customers but had no explicit agreement stating when title passed. California understood that the bank had to send the checks but did not have to complete delivery at the customers' destinations.

Commercial Code section 2401(2) distinguishes shipment contracts from destination contracts. When the seller must send goods but not deliver them at destination, title passes when and where the seller ships them.

Under those assumed facts, title to the checks passed at shipment. The memorandum addressed that title-timing element of the delivery-charge analysis.

Common questions

Was there an explicit title clause?

No.

Did the bank have a destination-delivery obligation?

Not as California understood the arrangement.

When did title pass?

At the time and place of shipment.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Com. Code § 2401(2) — title passage when a contract requires shipment versus delivery at destination

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

San Francisco – Auditing (AHT)

From:

Tax Counsel (JKM) - Headquarters

Subject:

B--- of A---

557.0508

December 22, 1970

SC -- XX XXXXXX

This is intended to supplement my December 17, 1970 memorandum to you concerning the taxability of delivery charges included in sales prices of personalized checks. In part, we advised that the delivery charges are taxable unless the deliveries occurred after title to the checks passed to the Bank’s customers. In this regard, California Commercial Code section 2401(2) provides that unless otherwise explicitly agreed, title passes to the buyer at the time and place at which the seller completes his performance with reference to the physical delivery of the goods, despite any reservation of a security interest and even though a document of title is to be delivered at a different time or place; and in particular and despite any reservation of a security interest by the bill of lading (a) if the contract requires or authorizes the seller to send the goods to the buyer but does not require him to deliver them at destination, title passes to the buyer at the time and place of shipment; but (b) if the contract requires delivery at destination, title passes on tender there. As we understand that there was not explicit agreement between the Bank and its customers as to when title to the checks passed to the customers, section 2401(2) would be applicable. Since the Bank apparently was only required to send the checks to its customers but was not required to deliver the checks to them, title to the checks passed to the customers at the time and place of shipment pursuant to section 2401(2)(a). With regard to the attached order list to which I referred, further review disclosed that it is an order list for Bank of C--- checks and that proces apparently do not include delivery.

JKM:smb
Attachment

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1970. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace