When did title to personalized checks pass if a bank agreed to send them to customers but had no explicit title clause or destination-delivery duty?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1970. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A bank sold personalized checks to customers but had no explicit agreement stating when title passed. California understood that the bank had to send the checks but did not have to complete delivery at the customers' destinations.
Commercial Code section 2401(2) distinguishes shipment contracts from destination contracts. When the seller must send goods but not deliver them at destination, title passes when and where the seller ships them.
Under those assumed facts, title to the checks passed at shipment. The memorandum addressed that title-timing element of the delivery-charge analysis.
Common questions
Was there an explicit title clause?
No.
Did the bank have a destination-delivery obligation?
Not as California understood the arrangement.
When did title pass?
At the time and place of shipment.
Citations and references
- Cal. Com. Code § 2401(2) — title passage when a contract requires shipment versus delivery at destination
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/557-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/557-0508.pdf
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
Memorandum
To:
San Francisco – Auditing (AHT)
From:
Tax Counsel (JKM) - Headquarters
Subject:
B--- of A---
557.0508
December 22, 1970
SC -- XX XXXXXX
This is intended to supplement my December 17, 1970 memorandum to you concerning the taxability of delivery charges included in sales prices of personalized checks. In part, we advised that the delivery charges are taxable unless the deliveries occurred after title to the checks passed to the Bank’s customers. In this regard, California Commercial Code section 2401(2) provides that unless otherwise explicitly agreed, title passes to the buyer at the time and place at which the seller completes his performance with reference to the physical delivery of the goods, despite any reservation of a security interest and even though a document of title is to be delivered at a different time or place; and in particular and despite any reservation of a security interest by the bill of lading (a) if the contract requires or authorizes the seller to send the goods to the buyer but does not require him to deliver them at destination, title passes to the buyer at the time and place of shipment; but (b) if the contract requires delivery at destination, title passes on tender there. As we understand that there was not explicit agreement between the Bank and its customers as to when title to the checks passed to the customers, section 2401(2) would be applicable. Since the Bank apparently was only required to send the checks to its customers but was not required to deliver the checks to them, title to the checks passed to the customers at the time and place of shipment pursuant to section 2401(2)(a). With regard to the attached order list to which I referred, further review disclosed that it is an order list for Bank of C--- checks and that proces apparently do not include delivery.
JKM:smb
Attachment
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1970. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace