Were separately stated airport-agent charges for delivering aviation fuel into an airline's aircraft taxable?

Short answer No if they equaled the actual airport-agent transportation cost, were added to an agreed fuel price, and the buyer bore cost changes. Airport business fees remained taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 557.0285
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1996-07-03
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Aviation-tax consultant representing several airlines

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This July 3, 1996 letter addressed airlines buying California aviation fuel and separately invoiced into-plane fees, airport fees, and a 4.3-cent federal aviation-fuel deficit-reduction tax. The into-plane conclusion assumed an independent airport agent transported fuel from airport storage directly into the aircraft, the fuel was not sold for a delivered price, cost changes went to the buyer, and the separately stated fee did not exceed the retailer's actual airport charge. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Retailer facilities, delivered-price terms, actual cost, airport fee purpose, federal certification, and current fuel-tax law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Airlines bought aviation fuel and paid separately stated charges for airport agents to move fuel from airport storage directly into their aircraft.

California excluded those into-plane fees when the airport agent—not the fuel retailer—provided transportation, the fuel price was agreed separately rather than guaranteed delivered, cost increases or decreases were passed to the buyer, and the fee did not exceed the retailer's actual transportation cost.

Airport fees charged for the right to do business at the airport were taxable business costs even if passed through separately. The 4.3-cent federal fuel tax could be excluded if the purchaser certified entitlement to the refund or credit described under the federal rule.

Common questions

Were qualifying into-plane fees taxable?

No.

Were airport operating-right fees taxable?

Yes.

Could the federal 4.3-cent charge be excluded?

Yes, with the purchaser certification described in the source.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6051, 6012(a), and 6012(c)(7); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, reg. 1628 — gross receipts and transportation exclusion
  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6012(c)(4), Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, reg. 1617, and I.R.C. § 4091 — federal fuel-tax exclusion discussed in the letter

Source

Original ruling text

557.0285

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward

LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
Telephone: (916) 324-2614
FAX: (916) 323-3387

DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego

July 3, 1996

BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
KATHLEEN CONNELL

Controller, Sacramento

Mr. B--- W. K--B--- A--- Consulting
XXXX --- Drive
--- ---, -- XXXXX

E. L. Sorensen, Jr.

Executive Director

Re: Measure of Tax on the Sale of Aviation Fuel
Dear Mr. K---:
This is in response to your letters dated March 20, 1996, regarding the measure of tax on the sale of aviation fuel to your clients. You state that you represent several airlines which fly in and out of various cities located in California and that these airlines are paying California sales tax reimbursement on their fuel purchases. You ask whether into-plane fees, airport fees and the federal aviation fuel deficit reduction tax of 4.3 cents per gallon, each of which are separately stated on invoices from the fuel retailers, are included in the measure of tax. DISCUSSION Retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax, measured by the gross receipts, unless the sale is specifically exempt from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012(a) defines “gross receipts” as the total amount of the sale price of retail sales of retailers, valued in money, whether received in money or otherwise, without any deduction unless specifically provided by statute. Into-Plane Fees Transportation charges which satisfy the requirements of Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012(c)(7), as explained in Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1628 (copy enclosed), are excluded from the measure of tax. Regulation 1628 provides, in part: “(a) ... [T]ax does not apply to ‘separately stated’ charges for transportation of property from the retailer’s place of business or other point from which shipment is made ‘directly to the purchaser,’ provided the transportation is by other than facilities of the retailer, i.e., by United States mail, independent contract or common carrier. The place where the sale occurs ... is immaterial, except when the property is sold for a delivered price or the transportation is by facilities of the retailer, as explained in (b) below. The amount of transportation charges excluded from the measure of tax shall not exceed the cost of the transportation to the retailer.

Mr. B--- W. K---

-2-

July 3, 1996
557.0285

“....
“(b)(1) ... ‘Delivered Price.’ Property is sold for a delivered price when the price agreed upon in the contract for sale includes whatever cost or charge may be made for transportation of the property directly to the purchaser. A sale for a ‘guaranteed price’ including a separately stated amount for transportation is a sale for a ‘delivered price.’ Property is not sold for a delivered price when the price is agreed upon and to this price is added a separately stated amount representing the cost or charge for transportation of the property directly to the purchaser and any increase or decrease in the actual cost of transportation is borne by or credited to the purchaser.” Our understanding is that the separately stated into-plane fees represent a charge to a retailer by an airport agent to deliver or cause fuel to be delivered directly into a purchaser’s aircraft from a storage facility at the airport. Thus, we assume that the transportation of the fuel is not by facilities of the retailer of the fuel. We further assume that the retailer is not selling fuel at a “delivered price,” as defined in Regulation 1628(b)(1). Rather, the price for the fuel is agreed upon and the separately stated amount representing the charge for the transportation of the fuel directly to the purchaser is added to that price, with any increase or decrease in the actual cost of transportation being borne by or credited to the purchaser. Under these facts, if the retailer of the fuel separately states such transportation charges in an amount that does not exceed the amount charged by the airport, the fees are for transportation which is excludable from the retailer’s taxable gross receipts. Airport Fees Our understanding is that airport fees are charged by the airport to aviation fuel retailers for the right to conduct business at the airport. Because airport fees represent another cost of doing business, they are included in the measure of tax. (See BTLG Annot. 295.1820 (9/5/74).) The fact that the retailer may subsequently pass such fees on to the purchasing air carriers and separately state such fees on its invoices has no effect on the application of tax. Federal Deficit Reduction Tax You ask whether the federal aviation fuel deficit reduction tax of 4.3 cents per gallon is included in taxable gross receipts. Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012(c)(4), as explained in Regulation 1617, excludes certain federal taxes from taxable gross receipts. Regulation 1617, provides in relevant part:

Mr. B--- W. K---

-3-

July 3, 1996
557.0285

“(a) RETAILERS’ EXCISE TAXES. Gross receipts subject to sales tax and the sales price subject to use tax do not include the amount of any federal tax imposed upon or with respect to retail sales whether imposed upon the retailer or upon the consumer and regardless of whether the amount of federal tax is stated to the consumer as a separate charge.... “(b) MANUFACTURERS’ OR IMPORTERS’ EXCISE TAXES. (1) Except as stated in (b)(2) below gross receipts subject to sales tax and the sales price subject to use tax include the amount of any manufacturers’ or importers’ excise tax included in the prices of the property sold, even though the manufacturer or importer is also the retailer thereof, and it is immaterial whether or not the amount of such tax is stated as a separate charge. “(2) Gross receipts subject to sales tax and the sales price subject to use tax do not include the amount of manufacturers’ or importers’ excise tax imposed pursuant to Section 4091 of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to diesel fuel and jet fuel for which the purchaser certifies that he or she is entitled to either a direct refund or credit against his or her income tax for the federal excise tax paid
. . . .”
For purposes of this opinion, we assume that the federal aviation fuel deficit reduction tax of 4.3 cents per gallon is the tax imposed on the sale of aviation fuel by the producer or the importer under Internal Revenue Code section 4091. Under these facts, if the purchaser certifies that it is entitled to either a direct refund or credit against its income tax for the federal excise tax paid, such tax is not included in taxable gross receipts. If you have any further questions, please write again. Sincerely,

Sophia H. Chung
Tax Counsel
SHC:rz
Enclosure: Regulation 1628
cc: --- District Administrator (--)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace