Could a printer exclude separately stated airmail or air-freight charges for sending prospectus proofs to the customer's lawyers and accountants before printing?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1975. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A printer sent proofs of preliminary and final prospectuses by airmail or air freight to the customer's lawyers, accountants, and other reviewers before printing began. Reviewers could correct or accept the proofs.
California treated the proofs as proofing materials consumed by the printer, not the object purchased by the customer. Shipping them was therefore a production expense included in the taxable charge for the finished prospectus, even when separately stated.
The source distinguished freight for distributing completed preliminary prospectuses. Those prospectuses were themselves items the customer sought and used, so their distribution freight was not taxable.
Common questions
Were the proofs treated as the sold product?
No.
Did separately stating proof-shipping charges make them excludable?
No.
Was freight for preliminary prospectus distribution treated the same way?
No. The source excluded that freight because the preliminary prospectus was itself sold to the customer.
Citations and references
- Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, reg. 1541 — printer consumption of proofing materials
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/557-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/557-0112.pdf
Original ruling text
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
557.0112
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-2641
October 17, 1975
This is in response to your letter of October 7, 1975. You advise us that your records are currently being audited on sales tax reported for the period July 1, 1972 to June 30, 1975. Our auditor has disallowed certain claimed freight charges in connection with proofs, and you inquire as to our views on this issue. We understand that a large portion of your business is the printing of preliminary and final prospectuses for large corporations. Before the printing of either the preliminary or final prospectus commences, you are required to deliver proofs to the customers’ lawyers, accountants, and other interested parties. Since time is of the essence, the proofs are sent out via airmail and/or air freight. The recipients of the proofs may make changes or corrections on the proofs and return them to you, or they can accept the proofs without correction. We are in agreement with our auditor’s conclusion that separately stated charges for transporting the proofs are not excludable from your measure of tax liability. We are of the opinion that these charges are nondeductible expenses incurred in the production of the items sold to your customers, namely the preliminary prospectus or the final prospectus is taxable, the measure of tax includes expenses incurred in the shipping proofs to the customer. While we recognize that proofs are a vital and intrinsic component in producing the final product and that you recoup your cost of producing the proofs in the charge made for the final product, we are of the opinion that the rule stated in our Regulation 1541 “Printing and Related Arts”, that typographers are the consumers of proofing materials, is applicable in this situation. The proofs are not the object of the sale but are the means of insuring that the object of sale meets the specifications of the customer. Tax applies when you ship the proofs because the charge made by you is regarded as a recoupment of an expense incurred in the production of a taxable item. If your customer were to ship the proofs to interested parties, the tax would not apply because your customer would not be making a taxable sale. We are further in agreement with our auditor that separately stated freight charges for the distribution of the preliminary prospectuses are not subject to the tax. This question arose sometime ago, and we initially took the position that the printer was the consumer of the preliminary prospectus. It was pointed out to us, however, that the preliminary prospectus is an item sought by the customer and used by the customer in fulfillment of its regulatory and
contractual obligations. In other works, the preliminary prospectus is an items which is sold to the customer under the contract. Very Truly yours, Gary J. Jugum Tax Counsel lb
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1975. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace