Was a publisher's separately shown estimated textbook freight exempt when the statewide bid used one delivered unit price?

Short answer No. The bid was a delivered price, and the invoice amount was an estimate for internal allocation rather than the publisher's actual transportation cost.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 557.0091
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1996-06-24
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Counsel for a county department of education

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This June 24, 1996 letter addressed a county education department buying textbooks through a statewide California Department of Education bid. The publisher's unit bid price included estimated transportation regardless of actual cost, the books moved directly by commercial carrier, and the invoice separately displayed a transportation amount used only for the publisher's internal accounting. The source's sample invoice figures do not arithmetically reconcile; this page does not rely on them. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Delivered-price terms, actual-cost tracking, invoice purpose, title passage, and current transportation law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A county education department bought textbooks through a statewide bid. The publisher quoted a unit price that included an estimated transportation component and shipped the books directly by commercial carrier.

Although the invoice separately displayed transportation, the publisher said the figure was not its actual shipping cost and existed only for internal accounting. California treated the bid as a delivered price because the department paid the agreed unit amount regardless of actual freight.

For delivered-price sales, the separately shown transportation exclusion could not exceed the retailer's actual cost. Because the displayed amount was an estimate rather than tracked actual freight, it remained taxable.

Common questions

Did separate invoice display make the freight exempt?

No.

Why was this a delivered price?

The unit bid included estimated transportation without adjustment to actual publisher cost.

What amount would have been needed for exclusion?

Qualifying separately stated transportation not exceeding the retailer's actual cost.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6012 — delivered-price transportation exclusion limited to actual retailer cost

Source

Original ruling text

557.0091

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
LEGAL DIVISION – MIC: 88
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082
TELEPHONE: (916) 445-3723
FAX: (916) 324-2618

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward
DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento

June 24, 1996

E. L. SORENSEN, JR
Executive Director

Mr. V--- R. F---, Counsel
O--- C--- Department of Education
S--- L--- Service
XXX --- Drive
P.O. Box XXXXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
Dear Mr. F---:
This is in response to your letter of June 10, 1996.
We understand that your office provides legal services to O--- C--- public educational agencies, including the O--- C--- Department of Education (“Department”). A sales tax question has arisen in connection with the Department’s purchase of textbooks from an educational publisher. You have sought our opinion as to whether sales tax applies to certain transportationrelated charges. The Department purchases textbooks directly from a publisher as part of a statewide bid process administered by the California Department of Education. The publisher’s bid price is a unit price, which includes the cost of the textbook and what you describe as “the estimated cost of transportation.” We take this to mean that the bid price is a delivered price. That is, the price includes transportation to the purchaser, without regard to what the actual cost of transportation may be to the publisher. The Department orders the books directly from the publisher which ships the books directly to the Department by means of a commercial carrier. You have furnished us with a sample invoice for textbooks ordered from the publisher. The invoice includes a separately stated amount identified as transportation. However, the published has represented to the Department that the stated transportation costs are not the actual costs of transportation, but are only stated for the publisher’s own internal accounting purposes. You note that the invoiced amount is based upon the extended net cost of the books ($2298.35) when added to the estimated transportation ($151.70) is approximately equal to the total invoice price ($1640.20), the difference is $.26.

Mr. V--- R. F---

-2-

June 24, 1996
557.0091

You are correct that ordinarily separately stated transportation charges are nontaxable, where delivery is made by commercial carrier. However, since the goods are sold for a delivered price (and assuming that title passes upon shipment), Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012 provides that such charges are nontaxable only if the separately stated transportation charged do not exceed the cost to the retailer of actual transportation. It has been our understanding that publishers do not track actual transportation. In cases of the type in question they base their bid price upon the total cost to be incurred in shipping the textbooks to customers in this state. They may allocate some portion of this cost to individual invoices, for internal bookkeeping purposes. It is our view that the charges in question are properly subject to tax. With respect to the invoice in question, tax was properly computed on the “estimated transportation.” Very truly yours,

Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel

GJJ:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace