Were meals sold by a county-run residential school to youth and senior students exempt, and were meals bundled with outside facility rentals exempt too?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A county education agency operated a residential science school. Bay-area students attended weeklong science classes tied to their home-school curricula, accompanied by their teachers. The facility also hosted a senior education program with three college-level courses over six days. Credentialed or otherwise qualified county personnel taught the programs, and county employees prepared the meals.
The Board treated the facility as a public school even though the county agency was not a legally separate school district. The decisive school characteristics were an academic program with regularly scheduled classes, required attendance, and qualified instructors; a degree program was unnecessary. Meals sold to both the youth students and the senior-program students were exempt student meals.
The result differed when the facility was rented to outside organizations with lodging and meals included. Those meal sales were not covered by the student-meal exemption, and the source treated the school's charge to the outside entity for use of the facility as the measure of tax. Because the rental terms were not provided, it gave no more specific opinion.
Common questions
Did the county agency need to be a school district?
No. The source found that its residential facility itself qualified as a public school based on the educational program.
Did students need to be in a degree program?
No. Regularly scheduled classes, required attendance, and qualified instructors were enough under the source's definition.
Were senior-program meals exempt too?
Yes. The senior program offered scheduled college-level instruction taught through the county facility.
What about meals furnished with an outside organization's facility rental?
Those were taxable, but the letter did not decide detailed rental allocations because it lacked the contract terms.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6363 (as cited)
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1603(j)(2)(A) (as cited)
- Gould v. Richmond School District and Board of Supervisors v. Cothran (as cited)
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/550-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/550-1436.pdf
Original ruling text
550.1436
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
WILLIAM M. BENNETT
First District, Kentfield
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-3828
BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
July 10, 1992
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles
GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director
Mr. T--- H----- & --XX --- Street
--- ---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
Re:
HY HQ XX-XXXXXX
M--- C--- O--- of E--Sales Tax on Meals
Dear Mr. H---:
I am answering your letter to me of May 21, 1992. Your client, the M--- C--- O--- of E---, has requested on the application of sales tax on meals which you indicate that it provides at its W--- C--- R--- facility. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND You describe the factual background as follows: "1. The M--- C--- O--- of E--- is a C--- level school entity which operates its own school sites in M--- C---. "2. W--- C--- R--- is a school of the O--- of E--- which provides science classes to students from the entire bay area. These students are sent by their home schools which pay for the classes received. "3. Home school teachers attend science classes at W--- C--- R--- with the students. The classes are coordinated to tie to the home school curriculums. "4. Class sessions last one week. Students and home school teachers live at W--C--- R--- during the sessions. Meals are provided. "5. The faculty at W--- C--- R--- consists of credentialed and classified personnel. The principal is credentialed by the State of California.
Mr. T--- H---
-2-
July 10, 1992
550.1436
"6. W--- C--- R--- qualifies for and receives commodities from the U.S. Government School Lunch Program. "7. W--- C--- R--- is also an accredited site for the ElderHostel Program. "8. ElderHostel coordinates education programs designed for senior citizens. Accredited organizations prepare and present three courses over a six day period. These courses are required to be college-level and the faculty is required to have college-level experience. "9. ElderHostel requires that course organizers provide lodging and meals during the six-day course period. "10. The M--- C--- O--- of E--- organizes and presents the courses offered through Elderhostel. ElderHostel only acts as a coordinator, registrar and publicist for the programs. "11. The W--- C--- Facility is also rented by the M--- C--- O--- of E--- to outside parties. The facilities include lodging and meals. "12. All meals provided at the facility are prepared by employees of the O--- of E---. No outside caterers are used." When you say that the M--- C--- O--- of E--- is a "county level school entity," we assume that it is an agency of M--- C--- rather than a school district formed under the Government Code. You do not indicate if the facility furnishes meals to the faculty. You conclude that W--- C--- R---'s sales of meals to its students and the ElderHostel students are exempt from tax but that its sales of meals to the outside organizations to whom it rents its facility are not. II. OPINION As you note, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6363, interpreted and implemented by Regulation 1603(j)(2)(A), exempts from tax the sale of meals and food products for human consumption furnished or served to the students of a school by public or private schools and school districts, among other organizations not applicable here. The M--- C--- O--- of E---, as a county agency, is not an "independent governmental agency distinct from the county, city, or town in which it is wholly or in part territorially situated," and so is not a school district. (Gould v. Richmond Sch. Dist. (1943) 58 Cal.App.2d 497, 502 [136 P.2d 864].)
Mr. T--- H---
-3-
July 10, 1992
550.1436
"The word 'school' is variously defined as an institution or place for instruction or education; a place for learned intercourse and instruction; a place for acquiring knowledge and mental training; a place for the instruction of children; a place where instruction is imparted to the young; an educational establishment." (Bd. of Supervisors v. Cothran (1948) 84 Cal.App.2d 679 [191 P.2d 506].) We have previously defined the term "school" as an academic institution conducting an educational program. It should have regularly scheduled classes, with required attendance, and qualified instructors. A degree program is not necessary. The facts indicate that the programs taught at W--- C--- R---, including ElderHostel, are regularly scheduled and taught by people with the proper credentials. They appear to be post-secondary classes. You also indicate that the programs taught under the auspices of ElderHostel are organized by ElderHostel but actually taught by W--- C--- R--- personnel. ElderHostel provides college-level instruction. The facility is a county agency, and county employees sell the meals. It is, then, a public school selling meals within Section 6363. Thus we agree with your conclusion that the facility's sales of meals to its students and to the ElderHostel students are exempt from tax. We also agree with your conclusion that Section 6363 does not exempt sales of meals by W--- C--- R--- to outside organizations to whom it rents the facility. Since the meals are apparently furnished as part of the rental, the measure of tax is the school's charge to the outside entity for the use of the facility. However, as we have no information on the rental terms, we render no specific opinion on them. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,
John L. Waid
Tax Counsel
JLW:es
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace