How should a religious fundraiser allocate one ticket price covering admission, an exempt meal, taxable wine tasting, and entertainment?

Short answer The ticket had to separate taxable and exempt amounts. Existing fixed tickets could use supported records; without segregation, the entire admission charge was the wine-tasting tax measure.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 550.0685
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-05-08
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A religious organization's fundraiser adviser asking about a bundled croquet-event ticket (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1992 staff-counsel letter assumes a $90 croquet fundraiser was conducted by or under the auspices of a qualifying religious organization and that its meal proceeds supported the organization's functions. The same official letter separately supports Annotation 550.0925 on the interaction between admission and the religious-meal exemption. Current law controls over both annotations. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A religious organization's all-day croquet fundraiser used a $90 ticket covering admission, lunch, and a wine tasting. The event also included a wine auction and a separately charged rare-wine tasting. The meal portion qualified for the religious-fundraiser exemption, the wine and tasting charges were taxable, and the admission or entertainment portion was exempt.

Because the ticket combined different tax treatments, the Board required a clear segregation of taxable and exempt items on the ticket. If already printed or otherwise fixed tickets could not be changed, the organization could substantiate the meal and entertainment allocation through its records for that event. Future tickets needed to state the segregation.

Without a proper allocation, the full ticket donation could become the measure of tax for the wine tasting. With a proper allocation, the exempt meal amount was deducted and the remaining portion above the taxable wine-tasting charge was treated as exempt admission or entertainment.

Common questions

Which parts of the $90 ticket were taxable?

The wine and wine-tasting charges were taxable. The qualifying religious-fundraiser meal and the separately identifiable admission or entertainment portion were exempt.

Did the allocation have to appear on the ticket?

Yes for future events. The source allowed records to support an allocation only where existing tickets had already been printed or could not be changed.

What happened if the organization made no segregation?

The source warned that the total ticket donation would be the measure of tax for the wine tasting.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6359(d)(4) and 6363.5 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1603(d), 1603(l), and 1670(a) (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Annotation 550.0680 and Board Pamphlet No. 18 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

550.0685

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-3828

May 8, 1992

Mr. T--- H----- & --XX --- Street
--- ---, CA XXXXX

Re:

SR -- XX-XXXXXX
S--- C--- V---

Dear Mr. H---:
I am writing this to answer your letter to me of April 10, 1991. You have requested an opinion as to whether tax applies to sales of meals at a fund-raising event which your client is holding on behalf of a religious organization. I.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Your client, S--- C--- V---, is holding a fund-raising event on behalf of S--- M--- C--(“S--- ”). You further describe the situation as follows: “1. S--- M--- C--- is a religious organization as described in California Sales and Use Tax Code Section 6363.5. It has received a property tax exemption as such under California Property Tax Code Section 214. “2.

Under the auspices of S---, S--- C--- V--- is staging a fundraiser.

“3.

The fundraiser consists of an all-day croquet tournament. Tickets for the tournament are $90.

“4.

Tickets for the tournament include admission to the tournament, lunch, and a wine-tasting.

“5.

The lunch is prepared by an outside caterer.

Mr. T--- H---

-2-

May 8, 1992
550.0685

“6.

Wines for the wine-tasting are donated by several wineries and individuals.

“7.

A wine auction is also conducted during the day.

“8.

In conjunction with the wine auction, a separate rare wine tasting will be held. A fee will be charged for tasting these rare wines.”

Based on the above facts you indicated that it was your belief that tax applied to the wine auction sales and to the charge for the wine tasting; the sales of meals were exempt under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6363.5; the portion of the admission price attributable to the entertainment is excluded from tax; and the winery is responsible for use tax on the wine donated for the auction and tasting. (Unless otherwise stated, all further statutory citations are to the Revenue and Taxation Code.) II.

OPINION
A.

Religious Fundraisers

As you are aware, Regulation 1603(l), interpreting and implementing Section 6363.5, provides as follows: “RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS. Tax does not apply to sales of meals and food products for human consumption furnished or served by any religious organization at a social or other gathering conducted by it or under its auspices, if the purpose in furnishing or serving the meals and food products is to obtain revenue for the functions and activities of the organization and the revenue obtained from furnishing or serving the meals and food products is actually used in carrying on such functions and activities. For the purposes of this regulation, “religious organization” means any organization the property of which is exempt from taxation pursuant to Subdivision (f) of Section 3 of Article XIII of the State Constitution.” Complicating the situation in this case is Regulation 1603(d), interpreting and implementing Section 6359(d)(4), which provides generally as follows: “Tax applies to sales of food products when sold within, and for consumption within, a place the entrance to which is subject to an admission charge, during the period when the sales are made, except for national and state parks and monuments, and, operative January 1, 1986, marinas, campgrounds, and recreational vehicle parks.” These two portions of the regulation seem to conflict. As you ask, does 1603(d) operate to negate the exemption provided in 1603(l)?

Mr. T--- H---

-3-

May 8, 1992
550.0685

We have previously decided that it does not. The question was raised with regard to a similar event held by S---. Attached hereto with the author’s permission is a memorandum written by Senior Tax Counsel Mary C. Armstrong to Mr. John Emmett of our Return Review Section dated February 7, 1990, discussing the issues raised by S---’ event at that time. Her memorandum answers two of your questions: (a)

Tax applies to the sales of the wine and the tasting charge; and

(b)

The portion of the admission price which represents the price of the meals is exempt from tax.

1.

Admissions Charge.

In the past we have determined that charges for admission to a place furnishing entertainment which is billed separately from the charges for meals were exempt from tax. (See, e.g., Annot. 550.0680.) Board of Equalization Pamphlet No. 18, “Tax Tips for Volunteer and Nonprofit Fund Raising Organizations” discusses on page 6 the guidelines for proper segregation of the charges for meals from the charges for entertainment as follows: “Organizations should pay special attention to events which provide food, drinks, prizes, and admission to entertainment for lump-sum amount designated as a donation. In general, where no segregation is made of the charges for the different items covered by the “ticket donation”, the proper measure of tax is the total amount of the donation.” The above discussion correctly states Board policy with regard to the sale of tickets for religious fund-raising events which provide both meals and entertainment. A clear segregation of charges must be made on the ticket for taxable and exempt items, otherwise the measure of tax for the wine-tasting will be the entire admissions charge. If proper segregation is made, we agree with you that, after deducting the price of the meals, the remaining portion of the $90 that is over and above the charge for the wine-tasting is exempt from tax. As noted above, the segregation must be made on the ticket. If, however, the tickets have already been printed or are not printed but the intended contents cannot be changed, the allocation for meals and entertainment will be allowed if S--- can demonstrate the allocation through its records. For future events, though, you should inform S--- of the necessity for making the segregation on the ticket. 2.

Tax on Wine Sales and Tasting.

Regulation 1670(a) provides that the donor of a gift is the consumer. In this case several wineries and individuals are donating wines S---. They are thus the consumer of the wines they

Mr. T--- H---

-4-

May 8, 1992
550.0685

donate. The measure of tax to the wineries is the production cost to the wineries. Presumably the individuals paid tax reimbursement when they bought the wines, and no tax liability attaches to them for their donations. For your information, I have enclosed a copy of Pamphlet No. 18. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,

John L. Waid
Tax Counsel
JLW:es
1067I
Enc.: Pamphlet No. 18
cc:

Mr. T--- H--S--- C--- V--XXXX --- Road
---, CA XXXXX

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace