Was a separately stated admission charge taxable when a theatre restaurant also required patrons to buy a minimum number of drinks or a dinner?

Short answer No. Because the admission charge paid for entry to entertainment and the required food or drinks were billed separately, tax counsel excluded the admission from taxable gross receipts.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 550.0680
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1965-01-28
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An internal inquiry about separately billed entertainment admissions and food or drink minimums

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1965. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1965
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This January 28, 1965 internal tax-counsel memorandum addresses two theatre-restaurant arrangements where the admission charge was separately stated from a mandatory drink minimum or dinner purchase. Its conclusion depends on that separation and the admission's connection to entertainment. Current law controls over the annotation. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Tax counsel considered two entertainment arrangements. In the first, a customer paid a separately billed cover charge and had to buy at least two drinks. In the second, a theatre restaurant charged admission at the door and required the patron to purchase dinner.

In both cases, the food or drink minimum appeared as a separate item. The admission charge therefore was not itself a minimum charge for food or drinks.

The memorandum concluded that a separately stated charge for admission to a place furnishing entertainment could be excluded from taxable gross receipts even though the admitted patron also had to make a minimum food or drink purchase.

Common questions

Did requiring two drinks make the cover charge taxable?

No, because the drink minimum was separately stated from the admission charge.

Did requiring dinner change the theatre admission result?

No. The source reached the same conclusion where admission was charged at the door and dinner was separately required.

Citations and references

  • The complete supporting memorandum cites no numbered statute, regulation, or case.

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

San Francisco – Aud. (LC/REP)

From:

Tax Counsel (PM)

550.0680

Date:

January 28, 1965

This is in reply to your memo of October 14 regarding the taxability of admission charges. In the first situation, the customer is required to buy a minimum of two drinks per person, the admission charge being billed separately as in the following example: 4 admissions (cover charge) at $4.00

$16.00

8 drinks (min. 2 per person) at $1.50 ea.

12.00
$28.00

In the second situation, a theatre restaurant makes a separate admission charge at the door, but the patron is required to purchase a dinner upon admission. It appears from these facts that in each instance the admission charge is not in the nature of a minimum charge for the food or drinks, since this is specifically covered by a separate item. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the admission charges may be excluded from taxable gross receipts. In other words, we do not believe the tax is applicable to separately stated charges for admission to a place furnishing entertainment, even though the patron upon admittance must pay a minimum amount for food or drinks.

PM:md

[1b]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1965. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace