Did a shopping-center doughnut shop owe tax on bulk doughnuts sold for off-premises consumption because the center provided a general parking lot?

Short answer No, on the submitted layout. The common parking area did not make the shop a drive-in, so bulk takeout doughnuts remained exempt while doughnuts eaten on the premises or patio were taxed.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 550.0580
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1964-11-06
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A shopping-center doughnut-shop operator (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1964. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1964
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This November 6, 1964 tax-counsel letter relies on the submitted drawing and assumes the shopping-center parking area served all center patrons rather than primarily the doughnut shop's customers. It distinguishes bulk off-premises sales from doughnuts eaten at the shop or patio tables under historical rules. Current law controls over the annotation. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A doughnut shop supplied tables and chairs, including patio tables, within a shopping center. The submitted drawing indicated that the parking area served patrons of the entire center rather than being provided mainly for customers eating the shop's products.

On that assumption, tax counsel did not treat the business as a drive-in. The shop still had to collect tax on doughnuts eaten on its premises and at its patio tables.

Bulk quantities sold for consumption away from the premises were not taxable under the historical rule, and purchasers did not need to sign statements for those bulk sales. The general shopping-center parking lot also meant the shop was not held to the drive-in's complete and detailed record requirements described in Bulletin 64-4.

Common questions

Did the common parking lot count as the shop's eating facility?

No, because the letter assumed it was for general shopping-center use rather than primarily for the shop's patrons.

Were doughnuts eaten at the shop taxable?

Yes. The source expressly required tax on doughnuts consumed on the premises or at patio tables.

Did bulk takeout buyers need signed statements?

No, under the submitted facts and historical rule.

Citations and references

  • General Business Taxes Bulletin 64-4 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

550.0580

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

November 6, 1964

Mr. J--- R. R--L---’s Donut Shop
XXXXX --- --- Boulevard
--- ---, California

-- - XXXXXX

Dear Mr. R---:
This is in reply to your letter of October 16 in which you inquire about the application of the Sales and Use Tax Law as it affects a doughnut shop. The drawing of your location in the shopping center implies that the parking area is for the general use of the patrons of the shopping center as a whole and are not provided primarily for the use of you patrons in consuming the products purchased at your shop. If such is the case, your business would not be held to be a “drive-in.” Accordingly, you would not be so strictly held to the complete and detailed record requirements of General Business Taxes Bulletin 64-4 (copy enclosed). So long as you are collecting the tax on the doughnuts eaten on your premises and at your patio tables, the sales tax would not apply to doughnuts sold in bulk quantities, and a signed statement by the purchasers of bulk doughnuts is not necessary. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to write to us again. Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
By ____
Philip R. Dougherty

PRD:md
Enclosure

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1964. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace