How did California tax race-horse and stud-stallion syndicate shares?

Short answer Each share transferred an undivided ownership interest in tangible personal property. California-located horse shares were subject to sales tax; an out-of-state sale could create use tax if the horse was intended to be brought into and used in California.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 540.0300
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1965-11-12
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A petitioner contesting tax on race-horse and stud-stallion syndicate shares (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1965. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1965
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Associate Tax Counsel recommendation dated November 12, 1965, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It was issued in a petition for redetermination and awaited later Board action. The recommendation sustained tax on syndicate-share sales but proposed deleting a negligence penalty because of confusion about the law. Another taxpayer should not treat this nonfinal staff recommendation as binding and should check current horse, syndication, fractional-interest, situs, intended-use, sales-tax, use-tax-collection, and penalty rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The petitioner sold syndicate shares in race horses and stud stallions. After reviewing the agreements, the source concluded that each purchaser acquired an undivided ownership interest in the horse.

A share sale while the horse was in California was a taxable retail sale. If the horse was outside California, sales tax did not apply, but use tax could later apply when the horse was brought into and used in California and that intended California use existed at the time of sale; known facts required the seller to collect use tax.

The recommendation included syndicate sales in the redetermination but proposed removing the negligence penalty because application of tax to undivided horse interests had been confusing. It was to be presented to the Board for later action.

Citations and references

  • The source recommendation cites no statute or regulation by number.

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

540.0300

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
November 12, 1965

Gentlemen:
This is to inform you of our recommendation with respect to your petition for redetermination of sales tax. The question in this matter is the application of the sales tax to sales of syndicate shares in race horses and stud stallions. After reviewing the syndicate agreements which you had previously submitted to this office, we agree with the position taken by Mr. "W" in his letter to you of January 7, 1965. We believe it is clear the purchaser of a syndicate share acquires an undivided interest in the horse. Therefore, the sale of the share is a retail sale subject to tax. If at the time of the sale the horse is located in California the sale is subject to sales tax. If at the time of the sale of the share the horse is outside the state the sales tax does not apply but later events may make the use tax apply. These events would be (1) that the horse is brought into the state and used here and (2) at the time of the sale it was intended the horse would be brought into the state. If these events are known by you at the time of the sale of the share, you should collect use tax from the purchaser in the same way as you collect sales tax reimbursement from purchasers when the sale occurs in California. Since it is clear that tax applies to syndicate shares, we must recommend that the tax be redetermined by including the syndicate sales which you have made during the audit period. However, because of the confusion as to the application of the tax to undivided interests in horses and to sales of syndicate shares, we are recommending that the negligence penalty was improperly imposed and should be deleted. We wish to thank you for your cooperation with our office and with our auditors. The Board will act upon our recommendation at its next meeting and you will receive official notice of their action in due course. This notice will also include a statement of the redetermined amount of tax less credit for payments which you have already made. Very truly yours,

John H. Knowles
Associate Tax Counsel

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1965. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace