Did 'educational purposes' under Regulation 1527 cover only master recordings made for schools and colleges?

Short answer No. California read the term broadly to include master tapes and records made for general instruction, education, and training presentations outside formal educational institutions.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 527.0140
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1985-12-31
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An unidentified requester seeking a definition under the amended sound-recording regulation

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1985
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1985 staff letter interpreted the ordinary meaning of 'educational purposes' in then-recent amendments to Regulation 1527. It did not address a completed sale or determine the tax treatment of a particular recording. Current sound-recording, digital-media, master-recording, educational-use, training, and tax-measure rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California said “educational purposes” in Regulation 1527 was not confined to recordings made for schools or colleges.

Using the ordinary broad meaning of education, the letter included master tapes and records produced for general instruction and education, such as training presentations. The amended language separately excluded recordings for video games or seismic surveys.

Common questions

Did the recording have to be used by an educational institution?

No.

Could a general training presentation qualify as educational?

Yes.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1527
  • Alpha Beta Acme Markets Inc. v. City of Whittier, 262 Cal.App.2d 16

Source

Original ruling text

527.0140

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-6450
December 31, 1985
Dear ______,
This is in reply to your October 16, 1985 letter regarding the recent amendments to Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1527, Sound Recording. You noted, that, under the amendments to the regulation, the term “master tapes and master records embodying sound” includes “tapes or records which are produced for use as radio commercials or other advertising, syndicated radio programs or for educational purposes. The term does not include recordings for video games or seismic surveys.” You asked for a definition of what the Board considers to be “educational purposes” under the regulation. We believe that the words of the regulation, like words or a statute, should be given their ordinary meaning where not otherwise clearly defined. (Alpha Beta Acme Markets Inc. v. City of Whittier, 262 Cal.App.2d 16.) Black’s Law Dictionary, Revised Fourth Edition, defines “education”, citing the case Barbers’ Commission of Mobile County v. Hardeman, 21 So.2a 118, to comprehend “not merely the instruction received at school or college but the whole course of training, moral, intellectual and physical. Education may be particularly directed to either the mental, moral or physical powers and faculties but in its broadest and best sense it relates to them all.” With this definition in mind, we believe that the term “educational purposes” as used in Regulation 1527 includes not only master tapes and master records made for educational institutions, but also master tapes and records which are produced for other general instruction and education such as training presentations. We hope this answers your questions; however, if you need further information feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

R. L. Dick
Tax Counsel

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1985. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace