Did a press-clipping bureau sell tangible clippings when it monitored publications for subscribers and charged per clipping?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1951. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California reviewed whether press-clipping bureaus rendered services or sold tangible personal property to subscribers.
Although the source said the issue was not free from doubt, it treated the subscriber agreement as a service contract rather than a sale of the individual clippings.
Charges calculated on a per-clipping basis did not change the service classification, so the bureau's gross receipts were not taxable under the opinion.
What this means for you
Monitoring and clipping services
Unit pricing did not by itself make the delivered clippings the transaction's primary object.
Accountants and tax professionals
Document the monitoring work, subscriber instructions, selection process, delivery method, per-item charges, reproductions, and any standalone content sales.
Common questions
Q: Were press-clipping subscriptions taxable sales?
A: No.
Q: Did charging per clipping change the result?
A: No.
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: CDTFA Annotated Legal Opinions
- Annotation page: Annotation 515.1260
- Original supporting opinion: 515.1260 PDF
Original ruling text
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
515.1260
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Place: Sacramento, California
Date: July 27, 1951
To:
REDACTED TEXT
From: R. G. Hamlin
Re:
Press Clipping Bureau
You have asked whether press clipping bureaus should be regarded as rendering a service or as sellers of tangible personal property, for sales tax purposes. A review of our files indicates that press clipping bureaus generally have no procured seller’s permits, and have not been paying the tax. Nor has correspondence been found in our files indicating that the question has been previously presented to us. Although the matter may not be free from doubt we are of the opinion that the agreement between the press clipping bureau and its subscribers constitutes a contract for the rendering of a service, rather than an agreement for the sale of tangible personal property. Accordingly, we do not regard the tax as applicable to the gross receipts derived therefrom, even though the charges are based on a unit basis per clipping.
RGH:ja
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1951. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace