Was a separately charged federal annual trailer inspection taxable when it was optional and occurred after the trailer sale?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation § 396.17 required a trailer to pass an annual inspection before use. A trailer seller offered the inspection with its sales, but customers could instead buy the trailer and have the carrier or a commercial garage inspect it later.
California assumed the inspection happened after the trailer sale and that contracts or sales literature proved it was truly optional. On those facts, the inspection was not a service that was part of the property sale under Revenue and Taxation Code § 6012(b)(1), and its fee was excluded from taxable gross receipts.
What this means for you
Trailer and vehicle sellers
Post-sale timing and genuine customer choice supported separate service treatment.
Accountants and tax professionals
Preserve sales documents, inspection timing, federal requirements, alternate providers, optional language, and separate charges.
Common questions
Q: Was the optional inspection fee taxable?
A: No.
Q: Did the federal inspection requirement make the seller's service mandatory?
A: No. The customer could use another qualified provider.
Q: What assumptions controlled?
A: The sale occurred first, the inspection followed, and customer choice was documented.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6012(b)(1), 6051, and 6201
- Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation § 396.17
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: CDTFA Annotated Legal Opinions
- Annotation page: Annotation 515.1210
- Original supporting opinion: 515.1210 PDF
Original ruling text
515.1210
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-8485
May 9, 1991
J--- W. S--F--- T--- O--XXXXX --- Avenue
---, MI XXXXX-XXXX
RE:
Taxability of Inspection Fees
SZ OH XX-XXXXXX
Dear Mr. S---:
This is in response to your letter of November 27, 1990, inquiring whether fees charged by F--- to perform the U.S. Dept. of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Periodic Inspection are subject to California sales and use tax. Please be advised that we had not received your prior letter dated October 16, 1990. Facts and Assumptions You described the facts as follows: The U.S. Dept. of Transportation requires an annual inspection on trailers. Pursuant to Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulation Section 396.17, the motor carrier cannot use the trailer unless it has passed such an inspection at least once during the preceding twelve months and a copy of the inspection report is in the vehicle. F--- offers this inspection to its customers in conjunction with the sale of trailers. You contend that this is an optional charge and that alternatively, the trailer can be purchased and the motor carrier or a commercial garage could do the inspection the next day. (We assume for the purposes of this opinion that the inspection occurs after the trailer is sold and that the contract documents and/or the sales literature substantiate that this is truly an optional charge.) Sales and Use Tax – General Discussion Except to the extent specifically excluded or exempted by statute, the California Revenue and Taxation Code imposes sales or use tax on the gross receipts from the retail sale of all tangible personal property sold or purchased for use in this state. (Sections 6051 and 6201). (All statutory
Mr. J--- W. S---
-2-
May 9, 1991
515.1210
Citations are to the California Revenue and Taxation Code, unless otherwise noted herein. Services That are a Part of the Sale Section 6012 provides in relevant part: “Gross Receipts”. (a) “Gross receipts” mean the total amount of the sale or lease or rental price, as the case may be, of the retail sales of retailers, valued in money, whether received in money or otherwise…. (b) The total amount of the sale or lease or rental price includes…(1) [a]ny services that are a part of the sale. The Board of Equalization has long-taken the position that a charge for an optional inspection conducted after the sale of the item inspected is not a service that is part of the sale under Section 6012(b)(1). Consequently, the inspection service charge should be excluded from the measure of gross receipts which are subject to California sales and use tax. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to write to us again. Cordially,
Victoria Lani Arena
Tax Counsel
VLA:es
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace