Which book-processing activities were nontaxable professional library services, and which were taxable mechanical processing?

Short answer Bibliographic description, classification, and card verification were services; applying labels, card pockets, and the college name was taxable mechanical processing.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 515.1180
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1964-12-04
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A provider of library services to a college (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1964. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1964
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Tax Counsel opinion dated December 4, 1964, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It separates professional bibliographic, classification, and catalog-card work from mechanical application of labels, pockets, and a college name, and requires record segregation for any nontaxable deduction. Another library vendor, college, or book processor should check current cataloging, metadata, classification, labeling, stamping, book-processing, bundled-charge, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated three activities as nontaxable professional library services: preparing bibliographic descriptions for classification, assigning or verifying Library of Congress classification numbers, and inspecting or verifying book cards, pocket labels, and catalog cards.

Applying a classification label, card pocket, and college name stamp to each book was different. That work was mechanical processing included in the definition of a sale under section 6006(b), and its price was included in gross receipts under section 6012.

The vendor had to segregate taxable and nontaxable contract receipts in its records to claim a deduction for the professional-service portion.

What this means for you

Library vendors, colleges, and book processors

Professional classification judgment and physical book processing required separate treatment.

Accountants and tax professionals

Separate bibliographic work, classification, verification, labels, pockets, stamps, charges, and supporting records.

Common questions

Q: Were bibliographic and classification services taxable?

A: No.

Q: Was applying labels, pockets, and ownership stamps taxable?

A: Yes.

Q: What records were required?

A: A segregation of taxable and nontaxable receipts.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6006(b) and 6012

Source

Original ruling text

515.1180

December 4, 1964

REDACTED TEXT
Dear Mr. REDACTED TEXT,
I regret the delay in responding to your letter of August 24, 1964. It appears from the information contained therein and its enclosures that the items listed in the letter of REDACTED TEXT Business Manager, as follows: “a. b. c.

Bibliographical description of the book for classification purposes. Assignment of, or verification of, the Library of Congress classification number to each book. Inspection and verification of book card, pocket label and Library of Congress catalogue cards.”

constitute nontaxable professional library services.
Item (d), “Application of classification label, card pocket and college name stamped in book,” appears, however, to be a mechanical processing which we believe is included within the definition of “sale” in section 6006(b) of the Sales and Use Tax Law, and the price paid therefore as included within the definition of “gross receipts” in section 6012. There must be a segregation made in the records of the REDACTED TEXT Company of its receipts from the taxable and nontaxable portions of its contracts in order for the company to claim a deduction for the nontaxable portion of its receipts. Very truly yours, E. H. Stetson Tax Counsel EHS:fb cc: Inglewood – Subdistrict Administrator New York District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1964. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace