Were electronically delivered consulting, text, software, and information sold through a California-hosted online marketplace taxable, and could the platform be the retailer?

Short answer Electronic transfers without tangible property were nontaxable; a mailed hard copy made the full charge taxable, while the platform's retailer status remained fact-dependent.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 515.0952
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1992-12-09
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A representative of an online information marketplace (identities redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Senior Tax Counsel opinion dated December 9, 1992, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It addresses a dial-up marketplace, telecommunications delivery, a California host computer, hard-copy fulfillment, and several platform fees under historical law. The official annotation says the service qualified as a retailer, but the operative opinion says retailer status could not be decided on the supplied facts; this page follows the opinion. Another platform should check current marketplace-facilitator, software, digital-product, nexus, hosting, hard-copy, subscription, and fee rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An online service connected buyers and sellers of consulting, software, and information through personal computers and a California host. It billed buyers, paid sellers, and charged transaction, connection, sign-up, monthly service, and storage fees.

California said consulting results, prewritten text, software, graphics, sound, templates, and other information transmitted electronically from a remote location were nontaxable when no tangible personal property went to the buyer.

If a seller mailed a hard copy, however, the entire charge was subject to sales or use tax. The platform described itself as only a broker, but counsel lacked enough facts to accept that conclusion and said it might be the retailer responsible for tax.

Maintaining the host computer in California would constitute a California place of business if the platform otherwise qualified as a retailer. The opinion therefore made nexus conditional on retailer status; it did not conclusively decide that status.

Assuming the platform was not a retailer of tangible property, buyer and seller access and connection charges were nontaxable. Data-storage charges also were nontaxable. The source did not separately resolve the listed account sign-up or transaction fees.

What this means for you

Online marketplaces

Electronic delivery treatment and platform retailer responsibility were separate questions.

Information and software sellers

Mailing a hard copy changed the result from nontaxable electronic transmission to a taxable full charge.

Accountants and tax professionals

Trace delivery media, billing and collection, who controls fulfillment, retailer identity, host location, and each separately stated fee.

Common questions

Q: Were electronically delivered consulting and information taxable?

A: No, when no tangible personal property was transferred.

Q: What if the seller mailed a hard copy?

A: The entire charge was taxable.

Q: Was the platform definitely the retailer?

A: No. The opinion said that depended on additional transaction facts.

Q: Did the California host computer create nexus?

A: It was a California place of business if the platform qualified as a retailer.

Q: Were access, connection, and storage fees taxable?

A: Access and connection fees were nontaxable on the assumption the platform was not a tangible-property retailer; storage fees were nontaxable.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6051, 6201, and 6203(a)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1502(f)(1)(D)

Source

Original ruling text

515.0952

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

WILLIAM M. BENNETT
First District, Kentfield

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

December 9, 1992

GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

REDACTED TEXT
Dear Ms. REDACTED TEXT:
This is in reply to your October 6, 1992 letter regarding the application of sales tax to the following facts you described: "Our client operates an on-line computer service (the 'Service') for the buying and selling of consulting services, software and information. The Service links information sellers with information buyers through the seller's and buyer's personal computers and a host computer system the taxpayer maintains in California. "Our client's contact with the State of California will consist primarily of mailings, advertisements in magazines and telephone connections. Our client may make periodic appearances at conventions, trade shows and users group meetings, where he may give away free access and demonstration software. This software, which is necessary to obtain access to host computer, will be given away free of charge as promotional material in computer stores and other venues throughout the states. "Both buyers and sellers access the Service using their own computer and a modem. The information is then delivered electronically over the telephone line to the buyer's personal computer. In all cases information is transferred electronically without the transfer of Tangible Personal Property by our client. By providing a forum for the buyer and seller to meet, our client acts as a broker. "Sellers of information must write synopses of the information product they are offering, assign a price and post it electronically on the host computer. In some cases, the data consists of an electronic copy of an existing document. In other cases, the vendor may offer custom services. "The buyer obtains a perpetual, personal license to download and make one electronic or printed copy for his personal use of any material the buyer purchases. In addition, the buyer may gain access, without charge, to any material already purchased for as long as the material is available on the service."

515.0952

-2-

December 9, 1992

You go on to note the buyer and seller negotiate when payment is due. Your client mails the billing to the buyer's address. The buyer pays your client, and your client pays the seller. You further note your client derives its revenue by separately stating the following charges to the buyers and sellers: "1) transaction fees ranging from 10-40% of the sales price (seller only), "2) connection charges of $.09 per minute on-line (both buyer and seller), "3) a one-time new account sign-up fee, currently $35 (both buyer and seller), "4) monthly service fees, currently $8 per month (both buyer and seller), "5) storage fee based on the quantity of information stored on the host computer (seller only)." You asked whether any of the activities establish nexus between your client and the State of California. Yes, if your client's activities qualify the client as a retailer, then we believe that, by maintaining the host computer system in California, your client occupies a "place of business in this state." Under Revenue and Taxation Code section 6203, subdivision (a), your client would be engaged in business in this state. You asked whether the following charges would be subject to sales or use tax: "1) Sale of consulting charges invoiced by client if the results are sent electronically through the computer? "2) Prewritten text sold electronically through the computer and invoiced by client? "3) Other information, such as computer software graphics, sound, templates, invoiced by taxpayer?" Sales tax applies to the retail sale of tangible personal property in this state. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) Use tax applies to the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6201.) We have taken the position that tax does not apply to the transfer of information by electronic telecommunications from a remote location. (Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1502, subd. (f)(1)(D).) We assume that, in the three situations noted above, no tangible personal property is sent to the buyer. "4) Would taxability change if the seller mailed a hard copy of the information directly to the buyer? (Our client has no control over transactions outside the Service, as this would be.)"

515.0952

-3-

December 9, 1992

If the person you describe as the "seller" sends a hard copy of information to the buyer, the entire charge would be subject to sales or use tax. Although you conclude your client acts merely as a broker, we do not have sufficient information to determine whether we agree with that conclusion. Depending on the facts of the transaction, your client may well be the retailer responsible for payment of the sales tax or collection of use tax on the transaction. "5) Monthly access fees paid to our client by both buyer and seller? "6) On-line connection fee paid to our client by both buyer and seller?" Assuming you are correct that your client is not the retailer of any tangible personal property, the charges for the seller's and buyer's remote access to the computer by telecommunications are not subject to tax. "7) Storage fees paid by the seller for storing data on the host computer." tax.

Your client's charge for storing the seller's data on your client's computer is not subject to

We hope this answers your questions; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours, Ronald L. Dick Senior Tax Counsel RLD:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1992. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace