Were architectural-signage designs and blueprints taxable when the design company was not licensed to practice architecture?

Short answer Yes. The physical sign designs were the contract's true object, so the full charge was taxable unless separately stated work met the preliminary-art requirements.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 515.0438
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1994-10-03
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A representative of an architectural-signage corporation (identities partially redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Senior Tax Counsel opinion dated October 3, 1994, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It assumes the signage corporation was not licensed to practice architecture, even though two employees had architecture degrees, and that it delivered one blueprint set to each client. Another designer should check current architecture-licensing, professional-service, commercial-art, preliminary-art, digital-delivery, and blueprint rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company designed sign systems for existing and proposed real-estate projects and delivered one set of blueprints to each client. Some clients were developers and others were architects using the company as a signage subcontractor.

California found no statutory exemption for architectural services and assumed the company was not licensed to practice architecture. The source also found no facts showing that the sign designs were incidental to professional architectural services.

The true object was therefore the design embodied in tangible property. The company was a retailer of the sign designs, and sales tax applied to its full client charge unless a separately stated amount satisfied Regulation 1540's preliminary-art requirements.

What this means for you

Signage designers

Architecture degrees or architecture-related subject matter did not convert delivered sign designs into nontaxable professional services.

Developers and architects

A signage subcontractor's blueprint deliverable was treated separately from licensed architectural services.

Accountants and tax professionals

Confirm professional licensing, the contracted service, tangible or digital deliverables, and any separately stated qualifying preliminary art.

Common questions

Q: Were the sign designs taxable?

A: Yes. The opinion treated the delivered designs and blueprints as the contract's true object.

Q: Was there an architectural-services exemption?

A: No statutory exemption. Fees can be nontaxable when paid for genuine professional architectural services, but those facts were not shown here.

Q: Did having employees with architecture degrees change the result?

A: No. Counsel assumed the corporation itself was not licensed to practice architecture.

Q: Could preliminary art be excluded?

A: Only if the separately stated charges met Regulation 1540's requirements.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6006(a) and 6051
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1501 and 1540(b)(4)(A) and (c)

Source

Original ruling text

515.0438

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

MEMBER
First District

450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego

October 3, 1994
Mr. J--- E. K--N---, F--- & Co.
XXX --- Street, Suite XXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX

MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles
GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento
────────
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Re:

T--- '94

Dear Mr. K---:
This is in reply to your August 5, 1994 letter regarding the application of sales tax to charges by T--- '94 (T---, herein) for architectural signs. You provided the following facts: "Our client, T--- '94, is a corporation organized in California in 1994. T--- '94 employs approximately 22 people. Approximately 12 employees provide services related to architectural signage; two of them have degrees in architecture. T--- '94 provides design services that are architectural in nature. They design sign systems for existing and to be built real estate projects. Their clients are generally real estate developers and, in some cases, other architects hire T--- '94 as a subcontractor to meet their architectural signage requirements. T--- '94 professionals meet with the client, conceive the project and create design alternatives. Upon completion of the project, they provide one set of blueprints to the client." You sent an example of a T--- design of signage for what appears to be an office building's elevator bank identification, elevator corridor identification, and restrooms. Sales tax is imposed upon retailers at the applicable rate of the gross receipts from the sale of all tangible personal property sold at retail in this state. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) The law defines "sale" to mean and include any transfer of title or possession, in any manner or by any means whatsoever, of tangible personal property for a consideration. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6006, subd. (a).) Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1501, Service Enterprises Generally, provides, in part: "The basic distinction in determining whether a particular transaction involves a sale of tangible personal property or the transfer of tangible personal property incidental to the performance of a service is one of the true object of the contract;

Mr. J--- E. K---

-2-

October 3, 1994
515.0438

that is, is the real object sought by the buyer the service per se or the property produced by the service. Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540, Advertising Agencies, Commercial Artists and Designers, provides at subdivision (c): "Commercial Artists and Designers. The tax applies to the entire amount charged by commercial artists or designers for items of tangible personal property such as drawings, paintings, designs or sketches transferred to the client, whether or not the property is suitable for display or is useful for actual reproduction by photo-mechanical or other processes. "Tax does not apply to separate charges for preliminary art as defined in (b)(4)(A)." You believe that charges by T--- are exempt from sales tax based on an exemption for architectural services. There is no statutory exemption from sales tax for charges for architectural services. Rather, the board's legal staff has taken the position that fees paid to architects are paid for the architects' rendering of professional services. You have not provided facts which show that T--- provides the architectural signage incidental to the providing of architectural services. Also, although you note two of T---'s employees have degrees in architecture, we assume that T--- is not licensed to practice architecture under the Architect's Practice Act (Chap. 3, Div. 3, Bus. & Profess. Code.) Although T--- may provide substantial time and labor in developing its designs, we believe the true object of the contract between T--- and its client is the design provided by T--- in the form of tangible personal property. We believe that T--- is a retailer of designs of signs it furnishes to its clients. Sales tax applies to T---'s total charge to the client, unless T--- satisfies the criteria of subdivision (b)(4)(A) of Regulation 1540 to exclude separately stated charges for preliminary art. We hope this answers your questions; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Tax Counsel
RLD:plh
cc:

San Francisco District Administrator - BH

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1994. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace