Were an unlicensed designer's construction plans nontaxable original design services or taxable drawings made from another person's specifications?

Short answer Original ideas and lawful design services were nontaxable, but merely putting another person's specifications into blueprints was taxable and required a seller's permit.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 515.0435
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1991-03-27
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A prospective unlicensed design and drafting business owner (identity partially redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Tax Counsel opinion dated March 27, 1991, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It addresses a prospective unlicensed design business, then-current architectural-licensing exceptions, original ideas, customer specifications, blueprint copies, seller's permits, and tax reimbursement. Another designer should check current architecture and engineering licensing, original-design, drafting, blueprint, digital-file, seller-permit, resale, and sales-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California distinguished being paid to conceive and dictate original ideas from being paid to put someone else's specifications on paper.

Lawful original design, concept, and specification work was nontaxable, with blueprints transferred under the design commission treated as incidental. Additional blueprint copies furnished after completion were taxable.

Drafting plans from an architect's, engineer's, contractor's, or other person's supplied ideas and data was a taxable sale of drawings. The opinion cited Albers, where the customer purchased the detailed drawing for use rather than design expertise.

Although the requester was not a licensed architect, the source described then-current statutory exceptions for certain small dwellings, agricultural and ranch buildings, garages, nonstructural or nonseismic storefronts, interiors, fixtures, cabinetwork, furniture, and equipment. Original design within a lawful exception could be nontaxable; drafting another's specifications remained taxable.

Taxable drafting sales required a seller's permit and sales-tax reporting.

What this means for you

Designers and drafters

Independent creative judgment and lawful scope differed from technical transcription of customer-supplied specifications.

Accountants and tax professionals

Review licensing, statutory exceptions, who originated each design choice, contract language, blueprint copy count, delivery format, permits, and reimbursement clauses.

Common questions

Q: Were original design services taxable?

A: No, when lawful and based on the provider's own ideas.

Q: Were plans drawn from someone else's specifications taxable?

A: Yes.

Q: Were blueprints under an original design commission taxable?

A: The initial plans were incidental; later additional copies were taxable.

Q: Did taxable drafting require a seller's permit?

A: Yes.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6006(a) and (f), 6051, and 6091
  • California Civil Code § 1656.1
  • California Business and Professions Code §§ 5537 and 5538
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1699
  • Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 515.0380
  • Albers v. State Board of Equalization, 237 Cal.App.2d 494 (1965)

Source

Original ruling text

515.0435

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-8208

March 27, 1991

Mr. K--- R--K--- R--- and Associates
P.O. Box XXXX
---, CA XXXXX
Re:

Application of Sales Tax to Charges for Design
and Drafting Plans

Dear Mr. R---:
Your letter received by the State Board of Equalization at the beginning of February has been forwarded to me for a response. In your letter you state that on or about April 1, 1991, you intend to start a new business in ---, California. One of the primary services you will be providing is designing and drafting plans for construction, identical to the services of an architect. You ask if a design professional is required to charge sales tax and, if so, what you should do with the taxes after you have collected them. Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 imposes a sales tax upon retailers measured by the gross receipts from retail sales made in this state of tangible personal property. Although the sales tax is imposed upon the retailer, the retailer may collect sales tax reimbursement (usually itemized on the invoice as “sales tax”) from the purchaser if the contract of sale so provides. Civ. Code § 1656.1. All gross receipts from retail sales are presumed subject to tax until the contrary is established. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6091. There must be a sale before a transaction is subject to sales tax. A sale means and includes any transfer of title or possession, in any manner or by any means whatsoever, of tangible personal property for a consideration. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6006(a). A sale also includes a transfer for a consideration of the title or possession of tangible personal property which has been produced or printed to the special order of the customer. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6006(f).

Mr. K--- R---

-2-

March 27, 1991
515.0435

It is the Board’s position that fees paid to architects or engineers for their ability to design, conceive, or dictate ideas, concepts, designs, or specifications are not subject to the tax. Any blueprints provided under the architect’s contract or commission are incidental to the architect’s services and are not taxable, but tax does apply to any charges for additional copies of a blueprint transferred by the architect after the completion of the contract or commission. Business Taxes Law Guide (BTLG) Anno. 515.0380 (12/15/65; 4/25/88). An architect’s or draftsman’s charges will be taxable, however, if he or she is merely transferring the ideas, designs, and specifications of another person to a tangible form such as a blueprint or design layout. In the case of Albers v. State Board of Equalization (1965) 237 Cal. App. 2d 494, the taxpayer was a self-employed commercial draftsman who maintained his own office. He made detailed drawings for architects, engineers, and business firms based upon specifications and other date furnished by the person or firm placing the order. The taxpayer was not an architect or engineer, and none of the concepts, ideas, or designs depicted in the drawings produced by him were of his own determination. Nor were any of the specifications or other details shown in such drawings determined by him. The California Court of Appeals held that the transactions involved were taxable sales of tangible personal property, not nontaxable services. In so holding, the Court stated: “Plaintiff [the taxpayer] was not paid to conceive or to dictate any of the ideas, concepts, designs, or specifications in the drawings made by him. He simply applied his ability to the details supplied by the customer for the purpose of putting such details down on paper and thereby producing a drawing for use by the customer. In other words, the customer was purchasing the detailed drawing for his use, he was not purchasing the design or specifications pictured in the drawing.” (237 Cal. App. 2d at 497) We infer from your letter that you are not a licensed architect. Therefore, under California law you are limited in the type of architectural services you can perform. You may prepare plans, drawings, or specifications for certain types of single-family dwellings, multiple dwellings containing no more than four dwelling units, agricultural and ranch buildings, and garages or other structures appurtenant to the foregoing buildings. Business and Professions Code § 5537. With certain restrictions you may also furnish labor and materials, with or without plans, drawings, specifications, instruments of service, or other data covering such labor and materials to be used for nonstructural or nonseismic storefronts, interior alterations or additions, fixtures, cabinetwork, furniture, or other appliances or equipment. Business and Professions Code § 5538. If you are performing any of the above activities which are exempt from the architectural licensing requirements, your charges will not be taxable if you are paid to provide your own ideas and designs for the project. However, if you are associating yourself with an architect, engineer, or contractor for a particular project or otherwise agreeing to draw plans or designs pursuant to the specifications and data of another person, your charges for the transfer of the

Mr. K--- R---

-3-

March 27, 1991
515.0435

specifications and designs of that person to a tangible form such as a blueprint are subject to sales tax because you are making a sale of tangible personal property rather than providing a service. If you will be making taxable sales, you will need a seller’s permit and a seller’s permit number. To obtain the permit and number and to learn how to file sales and use tax returns and remit payments, you should contact you local Board office located at 546 Lawrence Street, P.O. Box 938, Quincy, California 95971-0938. The telephone number for that office is (916) 283-1070. We are enclosing Regulation 1699, entitled “Permits,” for your information. If we can be of further assistance, please write to us again. Sincerely,

Elizabeth Abreu
Tax Counsel

EA:cl
Enclosure
bcc:

--- District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace