How did California tax deposition transcripts, simultaneous carbon copies, first copies for other litigation parties, and additional photocopies?

Short answer Reporting and the original plus simultaneous carbons were services. Each other party's first required copy was nontaxable, while additional copies were taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 515.0070
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1978-04-26
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
California Board of Equalization Headquarters Petitions staff

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1978. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1978
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Tax Counsel audit opinion dated April 26, 1978, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It concerns a taxpayer that recorded and transcribed litigation depositions and Senate Rules Committee hearings, was not a registered shorthand-reporting corporation, and furnished originals, simultaneous carbon copies, later copies, and photocopies under then-current fee and discovery statutes. Another court reporter, hearing reporter, litigant, or transcript vendor should check current licensing, civil-procedure, copy-right, fee, digital-transcript, reproduction, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated recording and transcribing a deposition for litigation as a service.

The original transcript and carbon copies made at the same time were nontaxable when furnished to the party that hired the reporter. All other additional copies to that party were taxable.

Each other party to the litigation could receive one nontaxable first copy under the statutory right to a deposition copy on payment of reasonable charges. Additional copies beyond that first copy were taxable.

For legislative hearings, the original transcript and simultaneous carbon copies were nontaxable, while all additional copies were taxable.

The source tied its treatment to then-current discovery and fee statutes and left disputed factual questions for a preliminary hearing.

What this means for you

Court reporters, hearing reporters, and litigants

Original service output and statutorily required first copies were treated differently from later reproduction sales.

Accountants and tax professionals

Track the hiring party, other parties, originals, simultaneous carbons, later photocopies, legislative hearings, fees, and reporter licensing.

Common questions

Q: Was deposition reporting taxable?

A: No.

Q: Were simultaneous carbon copies taxable to the hiring party?

A: No.

Q: Were additional later copies taxable?

A: Yes.

Citations and references

  • California Code of Civil Procedure § 2019
  • California Government Code § 8211.5
  • California Business and Professions Code §§ 8018 and 8040

Source

Original ruling text

515.0070
Headquarters – Petitions (HL)

April 26, 1978

Tax Counsel (GJJ) – Headquarters
REDACTED TEXT
This is to advise you as to our opinion as to the proper application of the tax to certain charges regarded as taxable in the recent audit of the referenced taxpayer. The question which was referred to this staff for review concerns the proper application of the tax to charges made for transcripts and copies of transcripts. Apparently taxpayer records and transcribes depositions upon oral examination for use in judicial proceedings and also records and transcribes hearings conducted before the Senate Rules Committee. We note that taxpayer is not a “shorthand reporting corporation” as that term is defined by Business and Professions Code Section 8040 and that no corporation may in any manner represent that it is certified as a shorthand reporter unless it is properly registered under that section. (See B. & P. Code § 8018.) Apparently you have taken the position that tax does not apply to the furnishing of an original transcript to the person contracting for production of the transcript but that tax applies to all additional copies furnished to that person and to all copies supplied to other persons. Insofar as the recording and transcription of depositions for use in trial is concerned, we are of the opinion that the tax applies as follows: Tax does not apply to original copies (and carbon copies made at the same time as the original) furnished to the party contracting for the performance of the service. Recording and transcribing a deposition constitutes a service. It is immaterial that additional carbon copies may be transferred so long as those carbon copies were made at the same time as the original. Tax applies to transfers of all other additional copies. Tax does not apply to the first copy (carbon copy or photocopy) furnished to all other parties to the litigation. Code of Civil Procedure Section 2019 provides that upon payment of reasonable charges therefor any party to the litigation has a right to receive a copy of the deposition. Tax applies to all additional copies beyond the first copy, furnished to persons other than the person originally contracting with the reporter. The interpretation herein made is consistent with Government Code Section 8211.5 which regulates fees charged for the service of transcribing a deposition. The section in question regulates charges for originals and copies made at the same time as the original. Section 8211.5 does not regulate charges made for photocopies.

April 26, 1978

2

515.0070

Insofar as the recording and transcription of legislative hearings may be concerned, tax does not apply to charges made for an original transcript and carbon copies made at the same time as the original. Tax applies to charges for all additional copies. Additional questions may be resolved upon preliminary hearing where there is a full opportunity to develop the factual basis of any disputed application of tax. Attached are the audit working papers which were furnished to us by the district by its memorandum of December 23, 1977. J:alicetilton Attachment cc: Sacramento – Auditing (CNW)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1978. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace