Were laser-show charges nontaxable performance services or taxable equipment leases when the provider supplied or withheld an operator?

Short answer Operator-controlled shows were nontaxable services; leaving equipment with the client created a lease whose tax treatment depended on tax paid at purchase.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 515.0067
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1989-12-04
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A laser-light-show company (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Tax Counsel opinion dated December 4, 1989, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It addresses then-current lease elections for equipment acquired and leased in substantially the same form and assumes the equipment was not permanently installed. Another event company should check current operator-service, equipment-lease, purchase-price election, rental-receipt, mixed-use, credit, installation, and local tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A laser company designed and performed temporary shows for conventions, fairs, grand openings, parties, celebrations, billboards, walls, screens, and rooftops.

When the company supplied the equipment and its personnel retained possession and operated it, California treated the arrangement as a performance service rather than a sale or lease. The customer charge was not taxable, while the company owed tax on its equipment purchases as the consumer.

When the company installed equipment at the customer's premises and left it without an operator, the customer received temporary possession and the arrangement was a lease. If the lessor had bought the equipment tax-paid and leased it in substantially the same form, the lease receipts were not taxable. If the lessor bought it for resale without paying tax, use tax generally applied to rentals payable.

Mixed use complicated the calculation. Using equipment that had been bought tax-free for leasing could trigger use tax measured by purchase price, with credit for tax previously paid on rentals. The source recommended paying tax measured by purchase price on equipment that would be both operated by the provider and leased.

What this means for you

Event-production companies

Who controls and operates the equipment can change a performance service into a lease.

Accountants and tax professionals

Track each asset's acquisition tax, resale certificate, form as acquired, operator use, customer possession, rentals, purchase-price elections, and credits.

Common questions

Q: Were provider-operated laser shows taxable?

A: No.

Q: Was equipment left with the client a lease?

A: Yes.

Q: Were all lease receipts necessarily taxable?

A: No. The result depended on whether tax had been paid on the equipment's purchase price and the statutory lease conditions were met.

Q: Could later provider use trigger purchase-price tax?

A: Yes.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6006, 6006.3, 6010, 6201, 6202, and 6203
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1501 and 1660(c)(6)
  • Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 515.0990

Source

Original ruling text

515.0067

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

(916) 445-6450

December 4, 1989

REDACTED TEXT
Dear REDACTED TEXT,
This is in reply to your October 5, 1989 letter regarding the application of sales tax to charges by REDACTED TEXT. You noted the following facts: Our company performs laser light shows for conventions, fairs, grand openings, special events, private parties, and celebrations, ie; July 4th. We furnish all equipment, technicians, and manpower for these performances. Our shows are similar to laser light services used in rock concerts. Some include animated displays on walls, screens, etc. Our billboard displays consist of flashing logos and/or animation intermittently for a length of time, ie; hrs./min. with laser lights on walls, screens, billboards, rooftops, etc. No equipment is set up as permanent at any show site. All shows and displays are designed for specific events as requested by our clients. At no time do we give anything tangible with our service. When you contract to perform laser light shows by furnishing equipment together with your personnel who retain possession of the equipment and operate it, you provide a service rather than sell or lease tangible personal property. (Cf. Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6006, 6006.3, 6010; BTLG Annot. 515.0990.) In such case, your are the consumer, not the retailer, of the tangible personal property which you use in performing the service. Your charge is not subject to sales or use tax. Tax applies to the sale to you of the equipment you use. (See Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1501, Service Enterprises Generally.) When you set up equipment on your client’s premises and leave it without an operator, your granting temporary possession of the display is a lease of the display to your client. A lease of tangible personal property is a sale under the Sales and Use Tax Law unless the lessor leases the property in substantially the same form as acquired and pay sales tax reimbursement to his or her vendor or timely pays use tax measured by purchase price. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6006(g).) If your lease is a sale under this definition, you must collect use tax from your lessee, measured by rentals payable, and pay it to this state. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6201, 6202, 6203.) If your lease is not a sale, no sales or use tax applies to the lease; that is, if you lease the equipment in

December 4, 1989

2

515.0067

substantially the same form as acquired, and you pay sales tax reimbursement to your vendor or timely pay use tax measured by the purchase price, tax does not apply to your lease receipts. We will assume that you always lease the property in substantially the same form as acquired. If you purchase equipment to use (i.e., by your operator as opposed to your leasing it to another), you may not issue a resale certificate. If you had not paid sales tax reimbursement or use tax to your vendor, you must timely pay use tax to the state measured by purchase price. If on the other hand, you purchase equipment to lease and did not pay tax on the purchase (e.g., you issued a resale certificate or you purchased the equipment from an out-of-state vendor not engaged in business in California), all leases of that property would be subject to use tax measured by rentals payable. If you thereafter use that equipment (e.g., your operator operates it), you would owe use tax measured by purchase price less a credit for taxes previously paid on rentals. When that equipment is thereafter leased, those leases are subject to tax less a credit for the tax paid measured by purchase price. This is explained in subdivision (c)(6) of Regulation 1660, a copy of which is included in the pamphlet enclosed for your information, Tax Tips for Leasing Tangible Personal Property. As indicated in the previous paragraph, if your leases are sales and you also use the property yourself, your tax responsibilities become more complicated. To avoid this, we recommend that you pay sales tax reimbursement to your vendor or timely pay use tax measured by purchase price for equipment that you will use as well as lease, so that your leases will not be sales under the Sales and Use Tax Law. We hope this answers your questions; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours, Ronald L. Dick Tax Counsel RLD:sr Enc. bc: Sacramento District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1989. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace