Were monthly license fees for standardized commercial real estate data delivered temporarily on disks and CD-ROMs taxable even though customers had to return the media?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A commercial real estate information company maintained a database updated daily by its researchers. Customers paid monthly license fees and received data on disks plus building photographs and other multimedia on CD-ROMs. The disks needed updates as data became obsolete, while the image CDs remained useful, and customers had to return the media when the agreement ended.
Tax counsel treated the arrangement as a lease of tangible personal property rather than an information service. The company supplied standardized, noncustom information to numerous customers at established prices, using information generated from its preexisting database.
The company recorded the information onto the disks and CDs itself rather than acquiring already-recorded media and leasing it unchanged. The media therefore was not leased in substantially the same form as acquired. Tax applied to the rental receipts, and the company had to collect and remit it.
The opinion contrasted truly customized research: a single report created, collected, or compiled for one customer's particular order can be incidental to a service. Standard regional database products on physical media did not fit that exception.
What this means for you
Commercial data providers
Calling a transaction a license and requiring return of the media did not avoid lease treatment when customers received standardized database products on physical disks.
Real estate firms
Monthly fees for physical database updates and image CDs were taxable rentals under the facts reviewed.
Accountants and tax professionals
Review whether the information was created for one customer, whether pricing is standardized, whether the source is a preexisting database, and whether the provider records the leased media.
Common questions
Q: Did the return requirement make the transaction nontaxable?
A: No. It supported treating the arrangement as a lease rather than a sale, but the rentals were taxable.
Q: Why were the rental receipts taxable?
A: The company leased recorded disks and CDs that it did not acquire in the same recorded form.
Q: Was the information treated as custom research?
A: No. It was standardized regional information supplied to many customers from a preexisting database.
Q: Would one customer-specific report receive the same treatment?
A: Not necessarily. The opinion recognized that information specifically created or compiled for one customer's order can be a nontaxable service when a single copy is incidental.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6006(g)(5), 6006.1, 6010(e)(5), 6010.1, 6011, 6012, 6051, 6201–6204, and 6401
- California Civil Code § 1656.1
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1501, 1660(c), and 1700(a)
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: CDTFA Annotated Legal Opinions
- Annotation page: Annotation 515.0019.700
- Original supporting opinion: 515.0019.700 PDF
Original ruling text
515.0019.700
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
Telephone: (916) 324-2637
FAX: (916) 323-3387
DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
October 8, 1996
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
E. L. SORENSEN, JR
Executive Director
Ms. D--- P--R--- I--- G---, L.P.
XXXX --- Highway, Suite XXX
---, Maryland XXXXX
Re:
Account No. SS --- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Ms. P---:
This is in response to your letter dated September 5, 1996 regarding the application of tax on your company’s operations. You state: “R--- I--- G---, L.P. [(hereafter “RIG”)] is in the business of providing commercial real estate information to our customers through a license agreement. Our sales are based on monthly fees charged for this license agreement. Our database is updated daily by our team of researchers. The information provided is in the form of data and multi-media which are placed on disks and CDs, respectively. The date portion of the information becomes obsolete unless our customers receive updated data disks. On the other hand, the multi-media information on the CDs does not become obsolete as it includes actual pictures of commercial buildings. Pursuant to our license agreement, the customer is in breech of contract if the CDs are not returned…. We do not sell the disk or CD….” We understand your letter to ask whether tax applies on the amounts RIG charges its customers for its disks and CD ROMs. California imposes a sales tax on a retailer’s gross receipts from the retail sale of tangible personal property in this state unless the sale is specifically exempt from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) 1 When the sales tax does not apply, use tax is imposed on the sales price of property purchased from a retailer for storage, use or other consumption of that property in 1
This tax is imposed on the retailer who may collect reimbursement from its customer if the contract of sale so provides. (Civ. Code § 1656.1; Reg. 1700(a).)
Ms. D--- P---
-2-
October 8, 1996
515.0019.700
California. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6201, 6401.) 2 Taxable gross receipts or sales price generally include all amounts received with respect to the sale, with no deduction for the cost of materials, service, or expense of the retailer passed on to the purchaser, unless there is a specific statutory exclusion. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6011, 6012.) Gross receipts or sales price do not include amounts from the sale of a service provided the service is not part of the sale of tangible personal property. (See Reg. 1501; copy enclosed.) The distinction between the sale of tangible personal property and the transfer of such property incidental to the providing of a service is set forth in Regulation 1501: “The basic distinction in determining whether a particular transaction involves a sale of tangible personal property or the transfer of tangible personal property incidental to the performance of a service is one of the true object of the contract; that is, is the real object sought by the buyer the service per se or the property produced by the service. A lease of tangible personal property in California is a continuing sale and purchase unless the lessor leases it in substantially the same form as acquired and has made a timely election to pay California sales tax reimbursement or use tax measured by the lessor’s purchase price of the property. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6006(g)(5), 6006.1, 6010(e)(5), 6010.1, Reg. 1660(c)(2).) When the lease is a continuing sale and purchase because neither or both of the foregoing conditions are not satisfied, the lease is subject to use tax measured by rentals payable. (Reg. 1660(c)(1).) The lessee owes the tax and the lessor is required to collect it from the lessee and pay it to this Board. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6202, 6203, 6204; Reg. 1660(c).) We understand that RIG accumulates commercial real estate information for certain geographic regions and compiles that information onto computer disks and CD ROMs. RIG provides these disks and CD ROMs to its customers on a temporary basis. We further understand that RIG itself places the information on its disks and CD ROMs and does not purchase disks and CDs from a third party which already contain the relevant information. Thus, if RIG is regarded as leasing its disks and CD ROMs to its customers (as opposed to providing a service), tax would apply on the rental receipts from these materials since RIG would not be leasing the property (i.e., the disks and CDs) in the same form as acquired. Where tangible personal property is furnished to a customer to transmit information that was specifically created, collected, or compiled to meet that customer’s particular order, the transaction is regarded as a non-taxable service transaction. (See Reg. 1501.) In that type of situation, the transfer of a single copy of the compiled information on a computer disk or paper report is considered incidental to the providing of the service and tax only applies to the sale of such materials to the seller of the service. (Id.) However, where a transaction involves the delivery of tangible personal property which includes information not customized to a customer’s order (including a report previously prepared by the retailer on a custom basis) or generated from a pre-existing database, the transaction is a sale or lease of tangible personal property and is subject to 2
This tax is imposed on the retailer actually storing, using, or otherwise consuming the property. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6202.) A retailer engaged in business inside this state is required to collect this tax from its customers and remit it to this Board. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6202, 6203.)
Ms. D--- P---
-3-
October 8, 1996
515.0019.700
tax unless an exemption otherwise applies. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6051, 6201.) Information on computer disk or CD ROM is generally not considered “custom” when the seller/lessor maintains an established price based on the item ordered, the product sold or leased to the customer is generic in nature (e.g., the product is available on a state or county-wide basis), the product is delivered on a medium generally requiring mass production, or the product is generated from a seller’s pre-existing database. We understand that RIG is providing its numerous customers with non-customized information on computer disk and CD ROM at a standardized price. Under these facts, we regard the true object sought by RIGs customers to be the disks and CDs for the information contained in those items and not the providing of a service by RIG. This means that RIG is leasing disks and CDs to its customers not in substantially the same form as acquired. RIG must therefore collect tax on the rentals payable for its disks and CDs and remit these amounts to this Board. If you have any further questions, please write again. Sincerely,
Warren L. Astleford
Tax Counsel
WLA:rz
Enclosure – Reg. 1501
cc:
Out-of-State District Administrator – (OH)
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace