Were chiropractors, acupuncturists, nutritionists, and massage therapists consumers or retailers of vitamins, minerals, supplements, and orthotic products?

Short answer Treatment-related chiropractors were consumers, while acupuncturists, nutritionists, and massage therapists were retailers even with lump-sum service billing; general chiropractor sales were retail too.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 515.0011.725
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1991-03-28
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A supplement company's controller (identities partially redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Tax Counsel opinion dated March 28, 1991, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It applies historical statutes to a supplement supplier's sales to chiropractors, licensed acupuncturists, licensed nutritionists, and massage therapists, and distinguishes treatment furnishing from general retail sales. Another practitioner or supplier should check current professional-scope, food-product, medicine, supplement, orthotic, consumer-versus-retailer, seller-permit, resale-certificate, bundled-charge, and use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A supplement supplier asked when it could accept resale certificates from chiropractors, licensed acupuncturists, licensed nutritionists, and massage therapists buying vitamins, minerals, dietary supplements, and orthotic products.

Revenue and Taxation Code § 6018.4 made a chiropractor the consumer when furnishing covered products as part of professional treatment, even if the patient was separately charged. The supplier's sale to that chiropractor was taxable.

A chiropractor selling products generally without also treating the buyer acted as a retailer. With a seller's permit, that chiropractor could issue a resale certificate, then owed use tax on items consumed in treatment and sales tax on retail sales.

No parallel consumer statute covered acupuncturists, nutritionists, or massage therapists. California treated them as retailers of products supplied to patients whether separately priced or bundled with service in one lump sum. They needed seller's permits before issuing resale certificates; until then, the supplier had to pay tax and could collect reimbursement.

What this means for you

Health practitioners

Professional licensure alone did not establish consumer treatment; the source relied on an occupation-specific statute.

Supplement suppliers

Validate seller's permits, resale certificates, practitioner type, and whether a chiropractor buys for treatment or general retail sale.

Accountants and tax professionals

Separate treatment furnishing, general-store sales, practitioner category, bundled patient charges, consumed inventory, resale certificates, and seller-permit status.

Common questions

Q: Was a chiropractor the consumer of treatment-related supplements?

A: Yes.

Q: Could a chiropractor ever be a retailer?

A: Yes, for general sales not accompanied by professional services.

Q: Were acupuncturists, nutritionists, and massage therapists retailers?

A: Yes.

Q: Did lump-sum service billing make their products nontaxable?

A: No.

Q: When could the supplier accept resale certificates?

A: After a practitioner acting as a retailer obtained a seller's permit and issued a valid certificate.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6007, 6015(a), 6018.4, 6051, 6066, and 6091
  • California Civil Code § 1656.1
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1668

Source

Original ruling text

515.0011.725

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-3828

March 28, 1991

Mr. G--- B--Controller, M--XXX --- ----- ---, California XXXXX Re:

SR -- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Mr. B---:
Your letter of February 6, 1991, to the Legal Division has been referred to me for a response. You have requested advice regarding the proper sales and use tax treatment of sales of vitamins, minerals, and dietary food supplements to chiropractors, licensed acupuncturists, licensed nutritionists, and massage therapists (hereinafter generally “such practitioners”). You appear to be particularly concerned about when your company may accept resale certificates from such practitioners in order to properly sell its products to them free of tax. OPINION A.

Sales and Use Tax Generally

In California, except where specifically exempted by statute, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6051 imposes an excise tax, computed as a percentage of gross receipts, upon all retailers for the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail in this state. (Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to the Revenue and Taxation Code.) A “retailer” is one who engages in the business of making retail sales of tangible personal property. (§ 6015(a).) “A retail sale is one made for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business in the form of tangible personal property. (§ 6007.) “[I]t shall be presumed that all gross receipts are subject to tax until the contrary is established. The burden of proving that a sale of tangible personal property is not at retail is upon the person who makes the sale. . .” (§ 6091.) The retailer owes the sales tax, but it may collect sales tax reimbursement from the purchaser pursuant to agreement. (Civ. Code § 1656.1.)

Mr. G--- B---

-2-

March 28, 1991
515.0011.725

A retailer making a purchase for resale may issue a resale certificate (§ 6066) which conforms substantially to the requirements of Title 18, California Code of Regulation, Regulation 1668. (Sales and Use Tax Regulations are Board promulgations which have the force and effect of law.) A.

Chiropractors

Under the general scheme, where a sales transaction involves intermediate sellers who buy and resell the product, sales tax is due only upon the sale to the ultimate consumer (here, the patient). Any intermediate sales are treated as sales for resale, and so not includable in the measure of sales tax. (§§ 6007; 6091.) The legislature has, however, altered that scheme with regard to chiropractors. A chiropractor who uses or furnishes vitamins, minerals, dietary supplements, and orthotic devices in the performance of professional services is treated as the consumer thereof and not the retailer. (§6018.4.) Previous Board Staff rulings indicate that Section 6018.4 can cause a chiropractor to play two different roles when purveying such products. First, when dispensing the products in the course of rendering professional services – i.e., when it is recommended as part and parcel of the regimen of treatment that the patient take the products – the chiropractor is the consumer of the products. The chiropractor is “furnishing” the supplements within the meaning of the statute even when charging for them separately. On the other hand, when selling such products on a general basis without also rendering professional services to the purchaser, a chiropractor is treated as the retailer of those products. A chiropractor who sells supplements, etc., at retail must obtain a seller’s permit and may then issue resale certificates. Any such chiropractor to whom M--- sells its product may purchase free of tax by issuing M--- resale certificates, otherwise M--- will have to pay tax and may collect sales tax reimbursement at the time of sale. If a chiropractor issues M--- a resale certificate which it accepts in good faith, the chiropractor will then have to pay use tax on the products consumed and sales tax on those sold at retail. B.

Licensed Acupuncturists, Licensed Nutritionists, and Massage Therapists

There is no statute classifying these practitioners as consumers rather than retailers of tangible personal property, which they furnish in the performance of their services, as there is in the case of chiropractors. As a result, we regard acupuncturists, nutritionists, and massage therapists as retailers of the products they sell. They are selling these products at retail whether or not they bill the patient separately for the products, or include the products with their services, and bill the patient in one lump sum. As retailers they are required to obtain seller’s permits. If they do not have them already, they may obtain them from their nearest Board of Equalization field office. Once they have seller’s permits, they may issue M--- resale certificates. Until then, M--- must pay tax, and may collect sales tax reimbursement, on its sales to these practitioners.

Mr. G--- B---

-3-

March 28, 1991
515.0011.725

For your information, I have enclosed a copy of Regulation 1668. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,

John L. Waid
Tax Counsel

JLW:es
3754I
Enclosure:

Regulation 1668

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1991. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace