Were straw and damaged hay exempt fertilizer when applied to land producing food or sale crops?

Short answer No. California classified hay and straw as soil amendments rather than fertilizer, so their retail sales remained taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 510.0880
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1950-01-30
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An agricultural association asking about straw and damaged hay used on land

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1950. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1950
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1950 opinion classified straw and hay as soil amendments rather than fertilizer under then-current law. The same source broadly treated cover-crop seed as taxable, while the current official annotation collection separately publishes later, more specific treatment of plowed-under vetch under Annotation 510.1600. Current hay, straw, cover-crop, green-manure, soil-amendment, fertilizer, and exemption rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California classified straw and damaged hay applied to land as soil amendments rather than fertilizer. The fertilizer exemption therefore did not apply, even when the land's products would be human food or sold in the regular course of business.

The source also stated a broad historical view that cover crops and seed used for cover crops were taxable. Because the official collection contains later, more specific cover-crop treatment, that statement should not be used without checking current law.

Common questions

Were straw and damaged hay exempt fertilizer?

No.

Did use on food-producing land change the result?

No.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6358
  • Historical California Agricultural Code § 1022

Source

Original ruling text

510.0880

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

January 30, 1950
C--- H---, G--- and
F--- D--- Association
XXXX --- Street
--- XX, California
Attention:

Mr. I. J. S---

Gentlemen:
This is in answer to your letter of January 18 with respect to our letter of January 12 concerning the application of the State sales tax to sales of straw and damaged hay as soil amendments. You are advised that the exemption with respect to sales of fertilizers by Section 6358 of the State Sales and Use Tax Law applies only to fertilizer to be applied to land the products of which are to be used as food for human consumption or sold in the regular course of business. As straw and hay are defined by Section 1022 of the Agricultural Code to be soil amendments, rather than fertilizer, this Board does not appear to have authority to extend the exemption of Section 6358 to sales of straw or hay, even though the straw or hay is to be applied to land the products of which are to be used as food for human consumption or sold in the regular course of business. With respect to your understanding that sales of seed for cover crops are exempt from the tax, you are advised that the Department of Agriculture has informed us that cover crops are also soil amendments. As we understand that cover crops are plowed under, the exemption relating to sales of seeds the products of which ordinarily constitute food for human consumption or which are sold in the regular course of business does not appear to be applicable to sales of seeds for such crops. Accordingly, upon inquiry to this office we have advised retailers of seeds that their sales of seeds for cover crops are subject to the tax. Very truly yours,

R. G. Hamlin
Associate Tax Counsel
RGH:HB
cc:

A. H. Flickinger

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1950. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace