Was Sudan grass seed exempt when planted as pasture grass for animals to graze?

Short answer Yes. California treated the resulting pasture as feed for animals whose products would be sold in the regular course of business.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 510.0260
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1953-02-26
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A certified public accountant asking about vetch and Sudan grass seed

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1953. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1953
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1953 opinion applied historical Ruling 48 to Sudan grass planted primarily as pasture for animals to graze. The same February 26 memorandum separately treats plowed-under vetch as fertilizer and is also published as Annotation 510.1600; this page focuses on Sudan grass. Current pasture, seed, grazing, animal-feed, livestock-product, purchaser-use, and exemption rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California exempted Sudan grass seed used primarily to grow pasture grass that animals would graze. The source treated the pasture as feed for animal life whose products would be sold in the regular course of business.

Common questions

Was Sudan grass seed exempt for grazed pasture?

Yes.

Did the source treat the seed as fertilizer?

No. Its fertilizer discussion concerned vetch in the same opinion.

Citations and references

  • Historical Sales and Use Tax Ruling 48

Source

Original ruling text

510.0260

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

February 26, 1953

Mr. A--- W. B--Certified Public Accountant
--- --- --- Building
--- ---, California

Your letter of
November 24, 1952

Dear Mr. B---r:
You inquire concerning the application of sales tax to sales of vetch seed and Sudan grass seed. It is our opinion that vetch, when planted as a cover crop and plowed under, is a fertilizer as defined in Ruling 48. Accordingly, the sale of vetch seed for such purpose would be regarded as the sale of a fertilizer. We understand that Sudan grass is used primarily as a pasture grass, that is, it is planted in pasture and the animals are allowed to graze it. The sale of Sudan grass seed would therefore appear to fall within the exemption stated in the second sentence of Ruling 48. Very truly yours,

W. W. Mangels
Assistant Counsel

BH:ja
cc:

--- – Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1953. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace