Could bulbs qualify as exempt annual plants when destroyed after one growing season?

Short answer Yes, if the bulbs were actually plowed under or otherwise destroyed after one season and their products were sold in the regular course of business.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 510.0020
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1952-09-19
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
California Board of Equalization audit staff reviewing nursery bulbs

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1952. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1952
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: The 1952 source says the audit memorandum did not identify the type of bulb, so its conclusion is expressly conditional. It treated a bulb as an annual plant only if the bulb was in fact plowed under or otherwise destroyed at the end of one growing season. Current bulb, annual-plant, crop-product, nursery, purchaser-use, and exemption rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California said a bulb could be treated as an annual plant if it was actually plowed under or otherwise destroyed at the end of one growing season.

On that condition, the bulb sale was exempt when the resulting products would be sold in the regular course of business. The source could not classify a specific variety because the audit request did not identify the type of bulb.

Common questions

Did every bulb qualify as an annual plant?

No.

What condition mattered?

The bulb had to be destroyed after one growing season.

What had to happen to the products?

They had to be sold in the regular course of business.

Citations and references

The supporting opinion does not cite a specific statute or regulation.

Source

Original ruling text

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

510.0020
Sacramento
September 19, 1952

San Jose – Auditing (RGB)

Headquarters – Sales Tax Counsel

H--- E. T--T---’s Nursery
---

Account No. G-XXXXX

This is in answer to your memo of September 17 enclosing a copy of R. B. Dunlap’s memo of September 10 concerning the question of whether bulbs purchased for resale are to be considered consumed by the purchaser. The memo does not mention the type of bulb involved. If, however, the bulb is in fact plowed under or otherwise destroyed at the termination of one growing season, we will regard it as an annual plant, the sale of which is, therefore, exempt if the products are to be sold in the regular course of business.

E. H. Stetson

EHS:ph

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1952. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace