Were cellular-equipment sales exempt when a California agency paid 90% with federal transit funds and end users paid the other 10%?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A seller supplied cellular equipment for transportation vans serving aged and disabled people. The federal government funded 90% through California, while end users paid 10%.
The federal-purchase exemption did not apply because the seller made no part of the sale directly to the United States. Whether California or the individual end user bought the equipment, the entire amount received was taxable—including both the state's federally sourced 90% payment and the user's 10%.
Ordinary telephone service charges were not sales-taxable, but an extra amount required only from equipment purchasers was part of the equipment's taxable receipts. The example compared six months at $50 plus usage for a phone buyer with $25 plus usage for a service-only customer; the $150 difference was additional taxable gross receipts.
What this means for you
Grant-funded vendors, state agencies, telecom sellers, and tax advisers
Trace who legally buys the property, not where the buyer got its money. Also compare bundled service pricing with standalone service pricing; a required premium tied to the equipment sale can become part of the taxable sales price.
Common questions
Q: Did 90% federal funding make the sale a federal purchase?
A: No. The United States was not the purchaser.
Q: Was only the end user's 10% taxable?
A: No. The entire amount received for the equipment was taxable.
Q: Were all telephone-service charges taxable?
A: No. Only the extra amount imposed because the customer bought the equipment was included in taxable gross receipts.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6012, 6051, and 6381
- California Civil Code § 1656.1
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1614(a)(4)
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: CDTFA Annotated Legal Opinions
- Annotation page: Annotation 505.0754
- Original supporting opinion: 505.0754 PDF
Original ruling text
505.0754
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward
LEGAL DIVISION - MIC 82
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
Tele: (916) 324-2637
FAX: (916) 323-3387
DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
February 23, 1995
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director
REDACTED TEXT
Re: REDACTED TEXT
Dear Mr. REDACTED TEXT:
This is in response to your letter dated January 19, 1995 regarding the application of tax on sales of cellular equipment and service. You state: "REDACTED TEXT is involved with several two-way communication system[s] which ... [are] funded 90% by a Mass Transit act of the Federal Government. The State of California acts as an intermediary of the program and collects the monies from the Federal Government and then pays our invoice. 10% of the monies is collected from the end user who uses the radio equipment along with step vans (also furnished by the Federal Government) to transport aged and disable[d] persons on a nonprofit basis." We understand from your letter that you ask what portion, if any, of REDACTED TEXT's sales of cellular equipment and service under these circumstances are subject to tax. Discussion California imposes a sales tax on a retailer's gross receipts from the retail sale of tangible personal property in this state unless the sale is specifically exempt from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) Taxable gross receipts include all amounts received with respect to the sale, with no deduction for the cost of the materials, service, or expense of the retailer passed on to the purchaser, unless there is a specific statutory exclusion. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6012.) The tax is imposed on the retailer who may collect reimbursement from its customer if the contract of sale so provides. (Civ. Code § 1656.1.)
REDACTED TEXT
-2-
February 23, 1995
505.0754
The exemption relevant to ACE's sales in this situation is set forth in Revenue and Taxation Code section 6381: "There are exempted from the computation of the amount of the sales tax the gross receipts from the sale of any tangible personal property to: (a) The United States, its unincorporated agencies and instrumentalities; "...." Sales of tangible personal property to state agencies (i.e., California governmental entities), however, are subject to tax unless otherwise exempted by statute. (See Business Taxes Law Guide Annot. 505.0660 (7/18/51).) In particular, the Revenue and Taxation Code section 6381 exemption does not apply to sales to a state agency, even if the agency uses funds supplied by the Federal Government to make the purchases of tangible personal property. (Reg. 1614(a)(4); Business Taxes Law Guide Annots. 505.0660 (7/18/51), 505.0640 (3/18/52).) We understand from your letter that REDACTED TEXT sells cellular equipment to either the end user (i.e., aged and disabled individuals benefitting from the "Mass Transit Act") or to the State of California for distribution to these individuals. If so, sales tax applies on the entire amount REDACTED TEXT receives on these sales since REDACTED TEXT does not make any portion of these sales directly to the Federal Government. That is, sales of cellular equipment to either the individual end-user or the State of California do not qualify for the exemption set forth in Revenue and Taxation Code section 6381 even though funding for such sales is ultimately provided by the Federal Government. This means that the measure of tax on REDACTED TEXT's sales include all amounts received with respect to its sales of cellular equipment, whether from the end-use customer who pays 10 percent of the sales price or from the State of California who pays 90 percent of the sales price. The calculation of REDACTED TEXT's taxable gross receipts from the sale of cellular equipment may also include amounts characterized as telephone service charges. Ordinarily, utility service charges such as telephone service are not subject to sales tax. However, when telephone service charges are more for a purchaser of a cellular telephone than for someone who does not buy a telephone, we consider this additional amount as part of the taxable gross receipts from the sale of the telephone and not as part of the nontaxable amounts paid for actual telephone service. For example, if REDACTED TEXT requires a cellular telephone purchaser to also purchase six months of telephone service and charges $50 per month, plus usage (and $25 per month, plus usage, after the first 6 months), but charges anyone who does not buy a cellular telephone $25 per month, plus usage, for every month including the first six, then REDACTED TEXT is getting $150 in additional taxable gross receipts when it requires the purchaser of the cellular telephone to also purchase the service. The taxable gross receipts from the sale of the cellular telephone would include that additional $150 the customer is required to pay. As set
REDACTED TEXT
-3-
February 23, 1995
505.0754
forth above, the Revenue and Taxation Code section 6381 exemption would not apply to these additional gross receipts since REDACTED TEXT's sales are not to the United States. If you have any further questions, please write again. Sincerely,
Warren L. Astleford
Staff Counsel
WLA:plh
cc: Sacramento District Administrator - KH
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace