Were postal uniforms exempt when employees ordered them but the Post Office paid vendors from each employee's uniform allowance?

Short answer Only to the extent the Post Office paid the vendor directly. Employee-paid amounts remained taxable, even if the Department later reimbursed the employee.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 505.0356
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1970-09-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A uniform retailer

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1970. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1970
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a September 21, 1970 California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It applies to the specific Post Office uniform-allowance payment process described and distinguishes direct Department payment from employee payment followed by reimbursement. Verify current rules and agency procedures. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Postal employees ordered uniforms from a retailer and submitted the invoice to the Post Office Department's disbursement officer. The Department deducted the charge from the employee's authorized uniform allowance and paid the retailer by Department check.

California treated the sale as a sale to the United States to the extent the Department paid the vendor directly. Tax did not apply to that portion.

Any amount paid by the employee was different. That amount was not a sale to the United States and remained taxable even if the Department later reimbursed the employee.

What this means for you

Uniform vendors, government employees, payroll teams, and tax advisers

Split mixed payments by who pays the seller directly. An agency allowance or later reimbursement does not convert an employee-paid charge into a direct government purchase.

Common questions

Q: Did the employee placing the order make the whole sale taxable?

A: No. The Department-paid portion was treated as a federal purchase.

Q: Were employee-paid amounts exempt after reimbursement?

A: No.

Q: What fact controlled the split?

A: Whether the Department or the employee paid the vendor.

Citations and references

  • The letter cited no numbered statute, regulation, or case.

Source

Original ruling text

505.0356

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

September 21, 1970

--- --- ----- --- ----- --- --Gentlemen:
This is in response to your letter dated August 28, 1970.
From your letter, we understand that you are a retail seller of uniforms, and that in the course of your business, you contract to sell uniforms to United States Post Office Department employees in California. Such employees are authorized uniform allowances by the Department. Thus, when an employee needs to acquire or supplement his uniform, he orders the necessary item or items from you, and upon receipt of the item or items ordered, he presents the accompanying invoice to the Department’s disbursement officer. The disbursement officer then deducts the amount of the invoice from the employee’s allowance and pays invoice amounts to you bi-weekly by means of a Department check. You ask whether such sales are taxable under the Sales and Use Tax Law. We have taken the position that sales of uniforms to Department employees in California are sales to the United States to the extent that payment therefore is made by the Department. Thus, tax does not apply to any amounts paid to you by the Department. Sales of uniforms to employees for which they make payment are not sales to the United States, however, and tax applies to any amounts paid to you by employees, even if they are subsequently reimbursed for their expenditures by the Department. Very truly yours,

J. Kenneth McManigal
Tax Counsel

JKM:smb
bc:

Out-of-State – Dist. Admin
New York

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1970. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace