Were sales by and purchases for an Army installation's three clubs and package beverage store exempt from California sales tax?

Short answer Yes, to the extent the system was established under the applicable Army regulation. California treated the clubs and store as federal instrumentalities, exempting their customer sales and California retailers' nonlease sales to them.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 505.0223
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1981-03-31
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An Army installation club system (installation identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1981. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1981
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a March 31, 1981 California State Board of Equalization staff-counsel letter published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. Its exemption is conditional on the installation club system being established under the appropriate Army regulation and excludes leases from the described exemption for retailer sales to the system. Verify current rules before relying on it. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An Army installation planned three clubs—for officers, noncommissioned officers, and enlisted personnel—and a package beverage retail store. California said those operations would be United States instrumentalities if established under the appropriate Army regulation, identified as Army Regulation 260-1.

Under that condition, tax would not apply to the clubs' and store's sales to customers. Tax also would not apply to California retailers' sales to the four operations, except leases.

The Board did not issue exemption cards. The installation system did not need a seller's permit for its exempt sales, and it could support exempt purchases by giving vendors a government purchase order or government remittance device. Purchases for resale were separately nontaxable.

What this means for you

Military club operators, beverage vendors, purchasing teams, and tax advisers

Confirm that the operation was established under the applicable service regulation. Give vendors recognized government purchase documentation rather than relying on an informal exemption card.

Common questions

Q: Were the clubs' customer sales exempt?

A: Yes, if the system was established under the appropriate Army regulation.

Q: Were vendors' sales to the clubs and store exempt?

A: Yes, other than leases, under the described rule.

Q: Did the Board issue an exemption card?

A: No. It directed the system to use government purchase orders or remittance documentation.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1614(a) and (d)
  • Army Regulation 260-1

Source

Original ruling text

505.0223

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
916/445-3237
March 31, 1981

Your letter of January 14, 1981 has been referred to the undersigned for reply. The purpose of your letter was to inform the board that the __ at _, California will commence operations of an Installation Club System on or about April 1, 1981. This system will consist of four revenue generating operations: three clubs (officer, noncommissioned office, and enlisted) and one Packaged Beverage Retail Store. You state that all of these facilities will operate as federal instrumentalities and as such are eligible to be exempt from state and local taxes. Although the and ___ is not scheduled to revert to Active Army Control until July 1, 1981, there are already nearly 500 active Army personnel assigned. The remoteness of the installation and the rapid personnel growth necessitates early operation of club facilities to meet social and recreational requirements. You request necessary tax exemption forms for the clubs and package beverage store operations. California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1614, “Sales to the United States and Its Instrumentalities,” provides in part that: “(a) Generally. Sales tax does not apply to sales, other than leases, to: “(1) The United States or its unincorporated agencies and instrumentalities.”


“(d) Army and Air Force Exchange Services, Navy Exchanges,
Coast Guard Exchanges, Open Messes, and Officers’ Messes. Army and Air Force exchange services…open messes and officer’s messes, established pursuant to regulations of the appropriate branch of the armed services are instrumentalities of the United States, and tax does not apply to sales, other than leases, to these organizations.” To the extent the proposed Installation Club System at ______ is established pursuant to appropriate army regulations, in this case, Army Regulation 260-1, it will be considered to be an instrumentality of the United States Government and tax will not apply to its sales to customers at

505.0223

the three clubs and the package liquor store. Tax will also not apply to sales, other than leases, by California retailers to the three clubs and liquor store. The California State Board of Equalization does not provide “exemption cards” in such instances. As an instrumentality of the United States Government, the ______ Installation Club System is not required to hold a seller’s permit and report and pay tax to the board on its sales. Your purchases from California retailers will either be purchases for resale, which are not subject to tax or exempt purchases. When making exempt purchases you should give California retailers a government purchase order or a government remittance device. We have enclosed a copy of Regulation 1614 for your reference. If you have further questions concerning this matter, please write this office again. Very truly yours,

Mary C. Armstrong
Staff Counsel

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1981. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace