Did the 1963 law fully exempt bunker fuel sold to foreign-flag tramp steamers?

Short answer No. It gave qualifying tramp vessels common-carrier status but still taxed fuel consumed between California and the first out-of-state port.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 500.0180
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1963-10-07
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A redacted bunker-fuel seller

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1963. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1963
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This October 7, 1963 staff letter interpreted Assembly Bill 1428 and the bunker-fuel exemption then in effect. It says the amendment expanded which vessels counted as common carriers but did not enlarge the fuel exemption. It is not current guidance or a ruling issued to another taxpayer; present vessel operations, ports, fuel consumption, transactions, and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Assembly Bill 1428 treated compensated tramp vessels and other water carriers in interstate or foreign commerce as common carriers, but it did not fully exempt their bunker-fuel purchases.

Fuel expected to be consumed between the California bunkering port and the vessel's first out-of-state port of call remained taxable. Only the portion transported unconsumed to the specified out-of-state destination could fall within the historical carrier exemption.

Common questions

Did foreign-flag status create a complete fuel exemption?

No. The letter rejected that interpretation.

What did the 1963 amendment change?

It expanded the common-carrier definition to include qualifying tramp vessels and other compensated water carriers.

What fuel remained taxable?

Fuel consumed on the voyage from California to the first out-of-state port.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6385 — historical common-carrier and fuel exemption interpreted
  • Assembly Bill 1428 (1963) — common-carrier definition amendment discussed
  • Sales Tax General Bulletin 59-6 — first-port fuel rule quoted in the letter

Source

Original ruling text

0902 Tax applies to tramp-steamer-fuel consumed on
route between California to first port-of-call.

500.0180

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

October 7, 1963
1514.70 Tramp Steamers. Tramp steamers have no greater exemption than that granted to other common carriers. The tax still applied to fuel which will be consumed en route between California and the first port of call. 10/7/63.

Dear ______,
This is with reference to your letter of September 30, 1963 in which you inform us that some of your customers who are owners of foreign flag ships believe that Assembly Bill No. 1428 “completely” exempts them from the sales tax sales of bunker fuel to tramp vessels. You desire our opinion as to whether the exemption is extended only to that portion of the fuel purchased and transported unconsumed to the first out-of-state port of call. The provisions of Assembly Bill No. 1428 simply gave common carrier status to tramp vessels and other water carriers engaged for compensation in transporting persons or property in interstate or foreign commerce. It, therefore, does not extend the exemption to transaction, which were not exempted under the prior law, between sellers and common carriers. This exemption was limited to the sale of fuel consigned to the common carrier at a specified destination outside this state (the first out-of-state port). It is so explained in Sales Tax General Bulletin 59-6, dated December 7, 1959, which in addition provides as follows: “The sales tax applies with respect to sales of that fuel oil which will be consumed in the voyage from the California port where the oil is taken on to the first port of call outside of California.” Assembly Bill No. 1428 made no change in this regard. It simply extended the meaning of the term “common carrier” to include tramp vessels and other water carriers engaged for compensation in transporting persons or property in interstate of foreign commerce. Very truly yours, E. H. Stetson Tax Counsel

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1963. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace