Was a corporation's transfer of property to a minority shareholder for shares held as treasury stock a sale or a dissolution distribution?

Short answer It was a sale, not a dissolution distribution. Tax applied unless the property qualified for the narrower occasional-sale exemption under section 6006.5(a).
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 495.0745
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1952-01-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A requester asking about corporate property transferred for a minority shareholder's stock

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1952. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1952
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1952 staff letter analyzed corporate property transferred in part payment for a minority shareholder's stock, which the corporation would hold as treasury stock. Its occasional-sale discussion used former section 6006.5 and then-current Ruling 81, which is not included with the published source. Current stock-redemption, corporate-distribution, occasional-sale, seller-permit, valuation, and sales-tax rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated a corporation's transfer of tangible personal property to a minority shareholder in part payment for that shareholder's stock as a sale. The corporation planned to hold the acquired shares as treasury stock, so the transaction was not a distribution of assets upon dissolution.

The sale was taxable unless it fit the occasional-sale exemption in section 6006.5. The substantially-unchanged-ownership provision in subsection (b) did not apply because ownership of the transferred property did not remain substantially unchanged.

Subsection (a) could still matter for property held or used in a separate corporate activity that did not require a seller's permit, provided the sale was not part of a series of sales large enough in number, scope, and character to itself require a permit. The letter suggested discussing the facts with the district administrator if the corporation had nonselling activities connected to some of the property.

Common questions

Was the property transfer treated as a shareholder distribution?

No. The corporation continued and held the redeemed shares as treasury stock, so the source treated the property transfer as a sale.

Did the substantially-unchanged-ownership exception apply?

No. The Board said ownership of the transferred property did not remain substantially unchanged.

Could any property still qualify as an occasional sale?

Possibly. Section 6006.5(a), as quoted in the letter, could cover property held or used in an activity not requiring a seller's permit if the transaction was not part of a sale series that itself required a permit.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Law § 6006.5(a) and (b), as quoted and applied in the 1952 letter
  • Sales and Use Tax Ruling 81, referenced but not reproduced in the official source

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

495.0745

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
January 2, 1952

Dear X------------:
This is in answer to your letter of December 5 with respect to the application of the State sales tax to the transfer by a corporation to a minority stockholder of tangible personal property in part payment for his shares of stock in the corporation. The shares of stock so acquired are to be held by the corporation as “treasury stock”. Under the facts stated it appears that the transfer of tangible personal property to the stockholder constitutes a sale, rather than a distribution of assets upon dissolution. accordingly, the transaction is subject to the sales tax unless it is exempt as an occasional sale within the meaning of Section 6006.5 of the Sales and Use Tax Law and Sales and Use Tax Ruling 81, copy enclosed. As the ownership of the property does not remain substantially unchanged following its transfer the transaction is not exempted by Section 6006.5(b) and the last paragraph of said Ruling 81. In view of the fact that the personal property sold was held or used in the activity for which the seller’s permit was required. If, however, the corporation was engaged in separate activities not requiring the holding of a seller’s permit, the sale of tangible personal property, or some portion thereof, may be exempted from the tax by Section 6006.5(a) which defines an occasional sale, in part, as follows: “ ‘Occasional sale’ includes a sale of property not held or used by a seller in the course of an activity for which he is required to hold a seller’s permit, provided such sale is not one of a series of sales sufficient in number, scope and character to constitute an activity requiring the holding of a seller’s permit.” If the corporation did engage in activities other than selling activities and the property sold, or a portion thereof, was held or used in connection with such other activities, we suggest that you discuss the transaction with Mr. Wm. R. Thomson, District Administrator, 357 South Hill Street, Los Angeles 13, California, for the purpose of ascertaining the application of the tax. Very truly yours,

R. G. Hamlin
Tax Counsel
RGH:ja
cc:

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1952. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace