Could an equipment lessor claim a defective-merchandise deduction after a lessee exercised a purchase option and received a full-credit replacement?

Short answer Yes. Full credit for the defective machine's rentals and option price allowed the lessor to deduct its original selling price when reporting the replacement sale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 490.0780
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1965-07-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Redacted equipment lessor

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1965. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1965
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This July 2, 1965 letter addressed equipment first leased with a $30,000 purchase option. The lessor reported use tax measured by rentals, later reported sales tax when the option was exercised, and then replaced the unsatisfactory machine at the same price while giving full credit for the original machine. The source does not detail the defect, replacement timing, or invoice mechanics beyond those facts. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Full-credit documentation, rental and option reporting, added consideration, whether the original property was defective, and current lease and return rules can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An equipment lessor reported use tax on rental receipts under a lease with a $30,000 purchase option. When the lessee exercised the option, the lessor reported sales tax on the remaining option price.

The equipment later proved unsatisfactory. The lessor took it back, supplied a new machine at the same price, and gave the customer full credit for the original machine—including the rentals and option price previously paid.

California allowed the lessor to claim the defective-merchandise deduction for the original machine's selling price when reporting sales tax on the replacement equipment.

Common questions

Did the earlier lease prevent a defective-merchandise deduction?

No, after the purchase option had been exercised and the customer received full credit on the replacement.

What payments had already been taxed?

Use tax had been reported on rentals, and sales tax had been reported on the option-purchase balance.

What fact supported the deduction?

The lessor gave full credit for the original machine and replaced it at the same price.

Citations and references

  • California defective-merchandise deduction — applied to the original machine's selling price when the full-credit replacement sale was reported

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

490.0780

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
July 2, 1965
Gentlemen:
This is in reply to your inquiry of June 28, 1965. It is our understanding that two years ago you rented a piece of equipment to a customer with an option to purchase for $30,000 plus sales tax. You collected and remitted use tax measured by rentals and when the option to purchase was exercised, you reported sales tax on the balance of the option price. The equipment proved unsatisfactory in operation. The problem was finally resolved by your agreeing to take back the original machine and replacing it with a new machine. You issued the customer full credit for the original machine and replaced it with a new machine at the same price. On the basis of the foregoing circumstances, it appears to us that you gave the customer full credit for the original machine when you replaced it with a new machine. In our opinion you are entitled to take the deduction for defective merchandise with respect to the selling price of the original machine when you report sales tax with respect to the new machine. Very truly yours, George A. Trigueros Associate Tax Counsel GAT:ls

[lb]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1965. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace