How did California tax an optional second-year appliance service-protection contract and the parts supplied under it?

Short answer The optional contract charge was excluded from appliance-sale gross receipts, but the provider consumed the repair parts and owed tax on their purchase price.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 490.0700
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1960-05-10
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Redacted appliance seller

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1960. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1960
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This May 10, 1960 letter addressed separately priced second-year service contracts for listed household appliances. It assumed the contract was optional, cancellable by either party, covered labor and parts, and supplied defective-part replacements without charge to the customer. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Whether the plan is truly optional, cancellation terms, separate price, customer charges, who buys and furnishes parts, and current service-contract rules can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An appliance seller offered separately priced second-year service-protection contracts covering labor and replacement of defective parts at no charge. The contracts were optional and cancellable by either party.

California excluded the contract charge from taxable gross receipts from the original appliance sale because the plan was an optional labor-and-parts warranty.

The provider was not treated as selling the replacement parts to the customer. It was the consumer of those parts and supplies and owed tax measured by its purchase price, including use tax if it bought them without paying tax.

Common questions

Was the optional contract charge taxable as part of the appliance sale?

No.

Did that make the replacement parts tax-free to the provider?

No. The provider was the consumer of the parts.

What if the provider bought parts ex tax?

It had to report use tax measured by its cost.

Citations and references

  • California optional-warranty treatment — excluded the separate plan charge and treated the provider as consumer of repair parts

Source

Original ruling text

490.0700

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

May 10, 1960

G--- A--- Company
XXX --- Street
--- ---, California
Attention:

B-XXXXX

Mr. C--- O. H--General Manager

Gentlemen:
In your letter of May 4 you inquired about application of sales tax to your receipts from sales of a “Service Protection Contract”, and application of use tax to replacement parts furnished thereunder. Concerning the contract, you state: 1.

It is not a mandatory contract and is a Second Year Warranty.

2.

Parts furnished under the contract are to replace defective parts only and at no charge to the customer.

3.

The contract may be cancelled at any time by either party.

Your charges for such Second Year Contracts are as follows: Standard Refrigerators Combination Refrigerators Freezers Ranges Dishwashers Disposalls Automatic Washers Washer-Dryer Combinations Dryers

$ 6.75
8.85
8.85
10.95
20.55
6.75
23.95
44.20
15.00

Inasmuch as each such “Service Protection Contract” is actually an optional labor and parts warranty, the charge for such contract does not constitute taxable gross receipts.

G--- A--- Company
Account B-XXXXX

-2-

May 10, 1960
490.0700

Since the charge for the warranty does not constitute part of the gross receipts from the original sale of the appliance, you are not considered to be the seller of the parts and supplies which you furnish under the contract. However, you are considered to be the consumer of such parts and supplies and are subject to tax measured by your purchase price of such parts and supplies. If you do not purchase such parts and supplies tax paid, you should report your cost thereof as subject to use tax. Very truly yours,

George A. Trigueros
Assistant Counsel

GAT:fb
cc:

San Francisco - Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1960. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace