Did an auto dealer owe additional sales or use tax on ex-tax parts installed free under a factory warranty?

Short answer No. The mandatory factory-warranty parts were treated as sold with the original automobile, so dealer installation and factory reimbursement caused no additional tax.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 490.0500
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1963-10-31
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Attorney asking about factory-warranty replacement parts

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1963. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1963
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This October 31, 1963 letter addressed automobile parts acquired ex tax for resale, installed by a dealer at no charge to the vehicle owner under the factory warranty, and reimbursed by the factory through an open-parts-account credit rather than cash. The answer relied on the replacement parts being furnished under the guaranty provisions of the original sale contract. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Mandatory versus optional coverage, customer charges, dealer-manufacturer invoicing, how parts were purchased, and current warranty rules can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An automobile dealer acquired replacement parts ex tax for resale, installed them at no charge to vehicle owners under a factory warranty, and received factory reimbursement—usually as a credit against its parts account.

California said the dealer owed no additional sales tax. Parts furnished under the original sale contract's guaranty were treated as purchased by the vehicle buyer when the automobile was sold, and the original taxable gross receipts already included their value.

No use tax applied either. Because the replacement parts were treated as sold in the original taxable transaction, their later storage, use, or consumption did not create a second tax.

Common questions

Did the factory's reimbursement method matter?

No. The source noted that reimbursement usually came as an account credit rather than cash.

Did the customer pay tax when the parts were installed?

No additional tax was due at installation.

Why was there no use tax?

The parts were treated as included in the original taxable automobile sale.

Citations and references

  • California mandatory-warranty rule — replacement parts furnished under the original sale contract were treated as sold with the automobile

Source

Original ruling text

490.0500

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

October 31, 1963
Mr. W--- D. H--Attorney at Law
--- Tower
XXXX --- ----- ---, California
Dear Mr. H---:
Your letter of September 17 to Mr. Harry L. Say was referred to the legal staff for reply. Please accept our apologies for not answering it any sooner. The inquiry concerns the application of the sales or use tax to replacement parts furnished to purchasers of automobiles under a factory warranty. The parts are installed by the dealer at no charge to the customer. The dealer is then reimbursed by the factory for the cost. Generally, this reimbursement takes the form of a credit against the dealer’s open-parts account, rather than the form of cash. All parts are originally acquired from the factory ex tax for resale purposes. You are correct in concluding that the dealer is not liable for any additional sales tax under these circumstances. Where replacement parts are furnished pursuant to the guaranty provisions of a contract of sale, the buyer is regarded as having purchased the parts at the time of the original sale. Accordingly, the sales tax paid by the retailer on gross receipts from the original sale include any sales tax which might be attributable to the value of the replacement parts. You are also correct in concluding that the described transactions would not give rise to any use tax liability. The use tax does not apply to the storage, use or other consumption of property, the gross receipts from the sale of which are required to be included in the measure of the sales tax. If replacement parts are furnished to a consumer pursuant to the guaranty provisions of a contract of sale, the parts themselves are regarded as being “sold” at the time the contract is made. Since the gross receipts from the sale (which includes the replacement parts) are required to be included in the measure of the sales tax, no further tax is due when the replacement parts are furnished to the customer. Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
cc:

Mr. Harry L Say
--- – Subdistrict Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1963. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace