Was a commissioned photograph purchased for resale merely because its image was reproduced in corporate reports that the corporation sold?

Short answer No. Reproducing the image was a use, not physical incorporation. A title transfer was a taxable sale; possession without title was a taxable lease on which the photographer collected use tax.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 442.0500
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1993-08-05
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A corporation commissioning product photographs for quarterly and annual reports (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an August 5, 1993 California State Board of Equalization senior-staff-counsel opinion issued to a corporation using product photographs in quarterly and annual reports and published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. Its result depends on reproducing an image rather than physically incorporating the photograph, and on whether the photographer transfers title or only possession. Different digital, licensing, or ownership facts may change the result. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation commissioned product photographs for reports it planned to sell. Its agreement gave it reproduction rights but not title to the photographs, and it asked whether the photographer's charge was a sale for resale.

The opinion said a photograph was not physically incorporated into a report merely because its image was reproduced there. Making the reproduction was a use of the photograph, so the resale claim failed.

Tax treatment then depended on the property interest transferred. If the photographer transferred title, the transaction was a taxable sale. If the photographer transferred possession without title, it was a lease; use tax applied and the photographer, as lessor, had to collect and report it.

What this means for you

Photographers, corporate publishers, licensing teams, and tax professionals

Separate reproduction rights, title, and possession. Image use in a publication does not by itself make the underlying photograph a physical component purchased for resale.

Common questions

Q: Did the photograph become part of the report?

A: No. Only its image was reproduced; the physical photograph was used in production.

Q: What if title transferred?

A: The photographer made a taxable sale.

Q: What if only possession transferred?

A: The transaction was a lease subject to use tax collection by the photographer.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1540(d)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1543

Source

Original ruling text

442.0500

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

MEMBER
First District

450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-6450

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles

August 5, 1993

GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

REDACTED TEXT

Dear REDACTED TEXT:
Re: REDACTED TEXT
This is in reply to your June 17, 1993 letter regarding the application of sales and use tax to charges for the use of a photograph in corporate quarterly and annual reports. You explained that you recently commissioned a photographer to take product photographs which will be printed in a corporate quarterly report. Under the agreement with the photographer, you merely received the right to reproduce the photograph but not title to the photographs. We understand that you will sell the quarterly reports which contain the photographic images. You asked whether tax applies to the photographer's charges or whether the transaction is a sale for resale to you. If the photographer transfers title to a photograph to you, sales tax applies to the transaction. If the photographer merely transfers possession of the photograph to you, the transaction is a lease. In the latter case, the applicable tax is the use tax, and the photographer, as the lessor, is required to collect the tax from you and report and pay it to the Board of Equalization. You may only purchase for resale tangible personal property which, prior to any use, you sell or physically incorporate as an ingredient or component part of tangible personal property you sell. The term "ingredient or component part" includes only those items that you physically incorporate into the property you sell and not those which you consume or use in the production of the property you sell. For example, the photograph does not become an ingredient or component part of quarterly reports you sell merely because the image of the photograph is reproduced as part of the quarterly reports. When you make a reproduction of the photograph, you make a use of that photograph. Tax applies to the sale of the photograph to you. See Sales

REDACTED TEXT

-2-

August 5, 1993
442.0500

and Use Tax Regulation 1540, subdivision (d). Enclosed for your further information is a copy of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1543, Publishers. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Senior Staff Counsel
RLD:ph
Enclosures: Regulations 1540 and 1543.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace