Could fruit packing houses buy soda ash and borax for resale because some chemical might remain on the produce?

Short answer No. Soda ash cleaned impurities, while borax primarily destroyed existing spores and mostly left in the bath; any residual protection did not control.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 440.0700
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1952-09-26
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A chemical seller asking about soda ash, borax, fungicides, and waxes sold to fruit packing houses

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1952. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1952
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization assistant-counsel letter dated September 26, 1952, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It grounds the soda-ash and borax results but, although it asks about wax, contains no wax analysis or holding; that source defect is separately documented for Annotation 440.3620. Another taxpayer should not treat this result as binding and should check current produce-packing, cleaner, fungicide, residue, manufacturing-aid, resale, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Fruit packing houses used soda ash, borax, and other chemicals while preparing fruit and vegetables for sale. The seller argued that some products became components of the produce.

Soda ash was taxable because its purpose was cleaning impurities from produce at the packing house, not physical incorporation. Borax was also taxable because its primary function was destroying fungus spores already on the fruit, and most of it left in the treatment bath. Some borax remaining to protect fruit after packing did not change that primary purpose.

The same official letter asks about waxes but ends without supplying any wax analysis or holding. That missing-content defect is documented separately for Annotation 440.3620 rather than inferred from its index summary.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6007 (as cited)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 14 (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

440.0700

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

September 26, 1952

B--- Company
XXXX --- --- Street
---, California
Attention:

Mr. C. B. C--Comptroller

Account No. X-XXXXX

Gentlemen:
This is in answer to your letters of September 3 and September 16 in which you inquire as to the application of the sales tax with respect to sales made by you of soda ash, borax, fungicides, and waxes to fruit packing houses. It appears that all of these products are used by such packing companies in the preparation of fruit and vegetables for sale. You state that certain of these companies feel that these chemical products become a component part of the fruit and vegetables and should be regarded as sold to them for resale. However, we do not regard soda ash or borax which is sold to such fruit packing companies as being purchased for the purpose of physically incorporating them into the manufactured article to be sold within the meaning of Sales and Use Tax Ruling 14, copy enclosed. We understand that soda ash is added at the packing house to act as a cleansing agent which cleanses the fruit of impurities found on the fruit at the packing house, not being added for the purpose of incorporation. It is also our understanding that borax is used primarily as a fungicide to destroy fungus spores which have accumulated on the fruit prior to its arrival at the packing house. While some borax remains on the fruit to protect it after its departure from the packing house, it is our understanding that most of the borax performs the function of removing existing spores and during the process goes off into a bath rather than permanently becoming a part of the fruit. Inasmuch as Section 6007 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code defines, in part, a retail sale as a sale for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business, it is our opinion that the sale of borax to the packing house constitutes a taxable retail sale.

B--- Company
Account No. X-XXXXX

-2-

September 26, 1952
440.0700

If you have any further questions we shall be happy to endeavor to answer them. Very truly yours,

W. W. Mangels
Assistant Counsel

WWM:ph

cc:

--- --- – District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1952. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace