Could fruit processors buy calcium hydroxide and calcium chloride for resale when about half the resulting calcium pectate left with the brine?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1942. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A fruit processor used calcium hydroxide and calcium chloride to supply calcium that combined with pectic acid in the fruit and formed calcium pectate, which set or firmed the product.
The chemicals qualified for resale. Although about half of the calcium pectate remained in the fruit and the rest was discarded with brine, the discarded portion served no separate purpose; the sole or primary purpose was creating the incorporated firming compound.
Other unspecified chemicals used to arrest fermentation and bleach fruit were taxable because they were entirely discarded with the brine after performing those process functions.
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/440-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/440-0550.pdf
Original ruling text
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
440.0550
Sacramento
July 30, 1942
To:
Mr. Burnett Sheehan
From:
E. H. Stetson
Re:
L--- - M---, Inc.
XXXX --- ----- --California
Your memorandum of July 20:
Permit
B-XXXX
It appears from your memorandum that the calcium hydroxide and calcium chloride are used only for the purpose of providing calcium which unites with pectic acid in the fruit to form calcium pectate, which “sets” or “firms” the fruit. Although you state that one-half of the calcium pectate remains in the fruit, the remainder being discarded in the brine, it appears that the portion discarded serves no purpose at all, and that the sole or at least the primary purpose of purchasing calcium hydroxide and calcium chloride is to provide calcium which remains in the fruit in the form of calcium pectate. It appears therefore, that the calcium hydroxide and calcium chloride are purchased for the purpose of resale. The other chemicals appear not to be purchased for resale as you state they are used to provide chemicals to arrest fermentation and bleach the fruit, and are entirely discarded in the brine at the end of the process. It is suggested that you advise taxpayer of our conclusions.
EHS.j
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1942. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace